Even the first readers of a dissertation cannot read it cover to cover. You are too familiar with the document to notice a patch and a promise that fills the space of a chapter, or where a key term was redefined.
An editor reads the whole thing in one sitting, which is the only way that kind of drift becomes visible. Back comes tracked changes plus a structural report on what the document is doing against what it says it does.
First, examiners read the introduction and the conclusion, then they dip. If these two sections do not align, the examiner proceeds to read the rest of the dissertation section by section in a suspicious manner. Most dissertation problems are like this: a failure to deliver what was promised rather than poor writing. Over the months of drafting, this day-to-day accumulated failure is what usually results in poorer overall dissertations.
Automated editing works within a paragraph. It has no way of telling that your methods chapter describes a sample size of forty, whereas your results chapter describes a sample size of thirty-eight, because the two sentences are ninety pages apart and are grammatically correct on their own.
First, the editor reads the whole thing without editing and takes notes on chapter structure. Structural chapter reports focus on what each chapter says it will include, what is actually covered, and where the gap exists. Then, he performs a line edit. Line editing is the most efficient way to tighten and strengthen sentences. If drafted chapters are going to be eliminated, line editing tightens sentences to weakness.
You’re usually allowed to edit your own drafted work; getting someone else to draft new work for you is not. We hold that line, so where an argument has a gap, the editor describes the gap instead of filling it. Send us your university’s editing policy and we work within its terms and limits.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical dissertation editing | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Yes, and it spreads the cost. There is, however, a trade-off. An isolated chapter can’t be cross-checked with chapters that don’t exist, so to work this way, most people take a shorter pass through the whole document at the end to check for consistency.
Numbering, captions, cross-references and agreement with the text. Yes. We do not check statistical calculations or reanalyze your data. If a figure contradicts the sentence you wrote to describe it, we will flag it and leave it to you to resolve it.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Corrections are often accompanied by notes, and about a third of the notes are short explanations. I’ve learned more about comma splices from this one document than from three years of tutoring and feedback.
I’ve been reading in this area for a year and a half. This review found three new papers for me, including one from 2019 that completely contradicts what I’ve been saying. Annoying, but useful, and it’s what I paid for.
The methods section appears to be written from the perspective of someone actually conducting the study as it addresses sampling, limitations, ethics, etc. The significance section was too general and would be much better if written specifically for my field of study, as only I know what would interest my colleagues the most. It actually led to less work for me.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees