Commentary becomes dated more quickly than most writing. One example is getting Thursday’s move in a Monday recap. That move isn’t just a weaker element of your writing. It is the element that stands out to your readers, who will then check your work because they were reading along as you posted it.
We consider this form of writing as reporting. The writer uses the actual market prints, the actual market closes, and the actual text of the statements, and the note bears a heading with the time span it covers so readers don’t look at Tuesday’s views on Friday.
Describing a market movement requires picking one reason out of six that explains that day, and being truthful when the movement had no reasonable explanation. It is possible for someone to write that second sentence. The commentary you would pay for is a paragraph that shows why the revision under that payrolls headline is more important than the payrolls headline itself.
A language model had no idea what happened yesterday. Quiz it, and it comes back with text that reads like commentary, confidently describing a session that was never held in a manner it invented. Readers that looked at the tape quickly point it out in a paragraph. A newsletter that loses their audience for this reason will not regain it.
The writer begins with actual data releases, actual closing levels, and the central bank’s actual speeches, and not with someone else’s summary. They then decide what the note supports, because a summary that lists nine items in the order they happened is a diary. Restoring the reader’s frame of reference is the real work.
We verify every level, date, ticker, and quoted line against its source before delivery, and whatever cannot be verified is removed rather than hedged. We do not predict on your behalf or voice a house view for you. If a note contains regulated content, it is prepared for your compliance team for their approval before distribution.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical market commentary | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daily note | 350 | $35 | $0.35 | $35.35 |
| Weekly wrap | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Monthly review | 1,600 | $160 | $1.60 | $161.60 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Anything from 100 words up. Because you pay by the word you are never buying padding to fill a package tier.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
Tell us the window before you order. We typically quote a three-day window as a standard delivery time because one of us has to research that ordinal. We will inform you if we are able to fulfill same-day orders, rather than take the order and hope and disappoint later. Recurring slots are much easier to hold open.
We will convert you desk’s positioning into a written form. We will argue against an argument we believe has no basis in the data provided. We do not create a view, a target, or a forecast and attribute it to your firm.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Most finance writers take the metaphorical pizza slice route. Our piece explained the math slowly and correctly, using the actual numbers we charge. Compliance signed it off, and they made zero changes. That has not happened in the three years during which I have done this job.
Explaining compound interest to those who left school at sixteen is difficult and this mainly tackles the issue. I requested and was given one worked example with real numbers. I wanted three, so I made two adjustments. Your definition of APR is the most comprehensible I have come across in any context.
I was told that the slide with the market size was not helpful, and the traction numbers were on slide fourteen. I had to admit that was correct, and it wasn’t easy to hear. The updated story was now eleven slides instead of the previous nineteen, and I stop losing the room after minute four.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees