A compliance guide gets read twice. The first reader is the person performing the task. The second reader is the auditor who reviews to confirm that the task was performed as prescribed by the compliance guide. Guides that are written for the first reader only end up unused, stored in a shared drive.
We build from the policies, the systems, and the framework version to which you are actually assessed. Ownership, evidence, and review frequencies are embedded in the text. Your compliance lead reviews it before it becomes the document everyone relies on.
Every general sentence in a guide will become a finding at some point. “Access should be reviewed periodically” adds no value to an auditor, and doesn’t provide a deadline to your team. Well thought out language means turning requirements into action, an owner, and a frequency. Someone who has the control language and your environment needs to do this.
Frameworks get renumbered between revisions, and models mix them. A guide citing a control number from a superseded version is caught on page one of an audit, and everything after is then read with suspicion. Generated guides also describe controls you never implemented.
Nothing gets invented. Based on your policies, system inventories, and prior audit reports, the author asks you about key gaps. They document open items rather than closed. As a result, you do not see your required practice mapped to the control.
We are clear about your obligations, but do not determine if you have met them. That is the role of your compliance officer, your assessor, or your attorney, and the guide is designed to expedite their review. Control references are adjacent to the text, open items are carried in one list, and nothing is presumed that you do not communicate to us.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical compliance guide | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-control procedure | 900 | $90 | $0.90 | $90.90 |
| Framework overview guide | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
| Full implementation guide | 4,500 | $450 | $4.50 | $454.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
We ask which framework, which version and which scope first. That determines the extent of reading the writer must do. If we can’t access the current text of a framework, we will communicate that to the client instead of processing their order. It is our responsibility to document your program; it is your assessor’s responsibility to certify it.
Since you purchased the guide, you have full control of the changes you want to make to it. If you would rather we make the changes, let us know and we can revise those sections for you for the same price as the original guide. Within the two weeks following delivery, you are allowed two rounds of revisions for corrections.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Compliance copy can be either overly vague or overly confidently wrong. This example is neither. The guide describes the discretion allowed by the regulation and the test to be used in those cases. In cases where the regulation does not provide discretion, the language is void and unambiguous. Internal Audit had no feedback.
I review external copy for a regulated lender, and that usually means deleting at least half of it. This had qualifiers in the right spots and no made-up stats. I only had to mark 2 sentences. That is the least I’ve marked on any outside first draft.
We threw away seven slides, and the traction numbers moved to slide three. Our first investor meeting after the change lasted twenty minutes longer than scheduled because the investors weren’t waiting for us to finish and were actually interested in what we were saying. You can figure it out from there.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees