You are offering a conference that sells in January but does not occur until October. You are sending out an unconfirmed speaker line up: themes and speaker tracks are not confirmed until August, but you are merging tracks and managing themes from week to week. Copywriting is done without this knowledge, and you are required to rewrite it four times.
An experienced conference writer builds in the give. Broad enough to accommodate a keynote withdrawing, specific enough that a delegate can tell your event apart from the three others sitting in their inbox that week.
Organizing a conference is a case of having the theme and track descriptions and abstracts and conference calls for papers and registration pages and over a hundred emails agree with each other. Keeping it all consistent requires a great memory. One person can easily hold the event in their head. A computer can’t. It needs to be able to answer every single prompt anew.
Generated abstracts converge inside a single program. Ask for forty and the fourth and the thirty-first both promise practical takeaways and actionable insights. A delegate standing between two parallel sessions then has nothing to choose on. Sameness inside one event does more damage than sameness across the internet.
Research consists of examining last year’s program and this year’s submissions. The writer goes through the abstracts as speakers submitted them, your call for papers responses, feedback from delegates if you chose to keep it, and sponsor commitments. The writer then determine the event’s true nature and names it.
Order the whole set at once, or in pieces as the program firms up. No account, no retainer. Fill out the form, and provide your dates with the draft agenda and a word estimate, and the writer will have questions for you before drafting begins. You pay by the word, and a program with an anticipated increase in word count also means an anticipated increase in price, unlike other services with fixed price tiers.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical conference copy | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration page set | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Program with session abstracts | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
| Full conference site copy | 4,000 | $400 | $4 | $404 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Every draft goes through an editor, then through several AI detectors and a plagiarism check. Anything that does not come back clean is revised or reassigned. You get the reports with the delivery email.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
Yes, and it is the best way to do this. Publish the submissions as they came in, however rough. The writer edits each one for length and voice and queries anything that doesn’t match the agenda. The writer never attributes a takeaway to the speaker that the writer simply made up.
Theme changes cascade, and so for us reshuffling them is like a brand new order. The two rounds included are for normal edits within the 14 day period. We quote honestly for a genuine repositioning as that means rewriting tracks and abstracts.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our applications typically answer a question that is broader than the one that is being asked. That was not the case on this application. All sections stayed within the word count and within the question. I am not claiming direct credit for this, but we got the grant. This was the best application we have submitted to date.
Everything we’ve made in house, every battle card, turned into three pages no one opened. This is one, with the two objections that actually show up and a decent answer for each. Adoption is the only metric we care about and it’s almost all there.
I wanted to say we have a bad quarter without causing a huge panic. The draft says the number, the two reasons, and what will be done to improve next quarter. Our biggest investor said only: good.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees