Every losing proposal has a first page describing how many years a company has been in business. The buyer is essentially looking to see if you have a clear understanding of the problem they have outlined in order to sell them a solution.
The writer constructs your notes with the language the client used and makes the scope boundary clear. That boundary is the section of your margin protected when the project length is extended by three weeks.
Proposals are scored based on how specific they are. The more specific, the better. This includes including names, dates, and methods that take the time needed to get approved by the buyer. A detailed and reasonable pricing structure helps each proposal demonstrate that the pricing outlined is justified. Understanding what was said on the call is quintessential to proposal writing.
A model precisely paraphrases an entire RFP to you to demonstrate their understanding, but simply regurgitating it back does not give any insight into their true understanding. Worse, the document hedges the exclusions and therefore the single most important provision that will give clarity on who pays the extra three weeks of overtime ends up being ambiguous.
Please include the call notes, and the RFP if there is one, and last quarter’s proposal that lost. The writer completes the sections for solutions and commercial offerings first, since those sections will determine the deal. Once that is done, the writer will prepare this buyer’s credentials section rather than using the standard credentials section.
Prior to delivery, someone other than the writer reviews the proposal against the buyer’s requirement list and marks unanswered questions. Prices, dates and names of staff are then assessed based on what you provided. Assurances of your capability are drawn solely from the information you provide, since an invented certification is an express path to disqualification.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical business proposal | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concise | 1,500 | $150 | $1.50 | $151.50 |
| Standard | 3,500 | $350 | $3.50 | $353.50 |
| Full submission | 7,000 | $700 | $7 | $707 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes. Send two or three pieces you like the sound of, or your style guide. Matching an established voice is ordinary work for a writer and close to impossible for a model that has never read your back catalogue.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
Yes that usually yields better results. Send the template and include two past proposals. Include one that won, and one that did not. That comparison will give a writer more knowledge on how your buyers make a decision than any brief will.
We’ll read feedback from the buyer if it was provided. Nobody in this business has a right to tell you that they can promise you a win rate, and you should watch out for anyone who does. What we’ll make sure of is that we avoid the same structural mistake in the next one.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees