A legal blog carries more risk than most content because it is likely to be seen by potential clients who could act upon it, by referring attorneys who will form an opinion of a firm based upon it, and in most states it qualifies under attorney advertising regulations and is subject to the same scrutiny as advertising in a television or billboard format.
So our writers work under your control to ensure your practice areas and the rules your bar imposes are reflected and others can tell when a statement about the law was written. Each proposed update is briefly assessed by your legal counsel.
Legibility in this format requires restraint. A statute will have exceptions within exceptions, and the writer who understands the topic will know which two exceptions matter to your reader and can summarize the rest by suggesting they ask a lawyer. The language pattern-matching person keeps everything.
Generated legal posts state deadlines with total confidence and get the state wrong. Filing windows, notice periods and damage caps differ across jurisdictions, and models blend them. Invented case citations are the other failure, and they read exactly like real ones.
Context takes time. Before a draft is written, the writer ensures the rule they’re trying to explain is not outdated, and knows which agency or court it originated in, and if it was amended in your state. This is done before any other reading is done, because an outdated rule explained using a clean sentence is worse than no post at all.
Responsible in this instance means the post cannot be mistaken for advice to a specific reader. We write with the jurisdiction you provided, the law’s date, and a disclaimer in your firm’s wording. We write nothing that speculates about the outcome of cases or implies results, and we post nothing without your attorney’s approval.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical legal-industry blog | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short update post | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Standard blog post | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Practice-area guide | 2,200 | $220 | $2.20 | $222.20 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes — 2 rounds are included, for 14 days after delivery, handled by the writer who wrote the piece rather than by someone new to the brief.
Fill in the order form with your brief and email address. No account needed. You get a confirmation by email, then the finished piece as a document within 3 days.
We comply with the rules you set, and avoid the language that most states restrict, including claims of specialization and superlatives and anything that implies a guaranteed outcome. We aren’t your compliance lawyers, either. The final edit against your bar’s rules is your firm’s responsibility.
Yes, that generally happens. The writer will use a short interview or their notes to draft in the attorney’s voice, and you own the copyright when we deliver it with no attribution to us. So the byline is theirs.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Compliance copy can be either overly vague or overly confidently wrong. This example is neither. The guide describes the discretion allowed by the regulation and the test to be used in those cases. In cases where the regulation does not provide discretion, the language is void and unambiguous. Internal Audit had no feedback.
I review external copy for a regulated lender, and that usually means deleting at least half of it. This had qualifiers in the right spots and no made-up stats. I only had to mark 2 sentences. That is the least I’ve marked on any outside first draft.
Our old landing page had six sections. This new one has three. The writer who was building the page was right about taking the founder story out. It’s a win when I see someone new to the page signing up.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees