Applications should not be thought of as singular documents. Rather, applications contain multiple pieces that require different types of answers. These include a personal statement, each with its own essay prompts, an activity list, and a referee who must be instructed on what they should include. Inconsistencies across these pieces should be avoided.
This addresses coherence. Since one writer handles the complete set, the leadership example in the activity list would not be the story you told in the main essay, and the referee brief would refer you to something else new.
Committees notice repetition when they read parts side by side. An applicant telling the same story three times has functionally told that story only once. Designing the set as a whole means each piece brings a different piece of evidence and the combination of the essays builds a picture which is broader than what can be built by any individual essay.
Applications require ample writing samples, but it can be hard to see how much you are repeating yourself, since prompts are standalone. One app concludes you have only one meaningful achievement, because your debate club exemplar is in almost every prompt.
The essay starts with a complete checklist of all submission requirements and the number of words allowed for each individual element. Evidence is then distributed across the list to be sure each component is represented before any drafting. This is the step most applicants skip. Once each component is addressed, each is written per each prompt and word limit.
Admissions systems require you to declare that you are the author of your work. You’d be wise to determine what you are signing and view drafts as inspiration to craft something original rather than text you will copy and paste. Interviews will assess your ability to discuss what you have written, and your efforts through memorization will not provide the instruments necessary to pass this particular test.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical university application writing support | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short statement | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Extended | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Yes, for applications written in English. Systems differ, so it’s best to send the application prompts and character limits since the writer will follow the application format published by the institution.
We provide delivery within three days, and we recommend you leave time to review and revise your work afterwards. Please include your deadline when you place your order and let us know if it’s within a week, and we will inform you if the full set can be delivered with the deadline you provided and what we suggest you prioritize.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Knowledge of the subject was excellent. The timings, however, were not. Three activities that would easily take fifty minutes were allotted thirty minutes time, which is something all teachers would notice. It was fixed after I mentioned it. Everything else, particularly the differentiation notes, saved our team a lot of time.
The content was clearly well organized. I asked for Harvard style referencing, but it was returned to me in APA style, which took one email and maybe half a workday to fix. That work, particularly the way it handled counterarguments, was unparalleled. The detection reports came along too, which is standard for my department.
I had hit a wall on two papers behind paywalls. Rather than skipping them or paraphrasing the abstracts, the writer found the accessible preprints, used those, and said so in a note. Small thing. It is the thing that told me a person did this.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees