One quick way to tell if something is a use-case page is if the title was changed but the content still serves as a feature description. The test is quite simple, and it’s to remove your product name. Would anyone be able to identify a use case with the page content? The majority of these pages will likely not be use-case pages since they are focused more on the release notes.
We do this backwards. Start with your product’s solution, where the workaround stops, and the problem the reader agrees they have. Then describe workarounds that current users of the product employ and where it breaks. Your solution is introduced on the page to meet this reader’s need(s) and will be described further in the section after this.
Because of the sequence, not the use of simple terms, this kind of explanation becomes clear. Provide the context, what people do about it today, where that leaves a gap, and only then what the product does. The third part is where readers in the funnel skip to, so that needs to be a real section. It can’t be a transition statement.
Generated use-case pages describe a product and say the product helps. They cannot describe a workaround, because the workaround exists in Slack and in spreadsheets that no model has ever seen. Removing the workaround leaves nothing for a reader who is not already convinced.
The author was granted access to a sandbox account, and, in the spirit of actually trying to complete the task the page is about, not a demo in which the steps are explained, the author takes notes where the task gets confusing. What typically takes three extra clicks usually ends up becoming the most helpful section of the final page.
They are built between blog posts and feature pages, so they have three functions. First, they capture paid advertising traffic targeting search queries aimed at problems. Second, sales staff can send these resources when a potential client describes a scenario or a problem rather than mentioning a need. Lastly, they support the email communication that is sent to address a user for the first time to help them learn how to get started with the product.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical use-case page | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single use-case page | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Detailed use-case page | 1,100 | $110 | $1.10 | $111.10 |
| Use-case hub page | 1,800 | $180 | $1.80 | $181.80 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
By addressing them separately before anyone writes. Feature pages respond to what does this functionality provide? Use-case pages respond to how do I consume this functionality? We address both sets of pages, identify the overlapping sections, and differentiate title tags and internal links in order to help search engines differentiate the pages.
A sandbox account is typically the best option and usually takes around ten minutes to build. Unfortunately, if access is not available, a video walkthrough of the workflow will have to suffice. The page will not have as much detail and will lose a lot of the small friction points that will make it more convincing.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
I’ve written and purchased a lot of feature copy, and most of it is vibes instead of verbs, which is a huge loss. This was not the case. It clearly stated what a feature did and what the change was in the system. It got our sales team reading it on the phone.
The customer we used in this example sent us a nice email saying it was the least stressful case study she’s had to do. This has never happened to us. I have to say the article is awesome, too. The customer liked the interview, but what I will remember is the process.
For six releases, our change log buried a breaking change in the release note, behind six other features. The writer has chosen to put breaking changes at the top of the release not with features. That makes obvious sense. It should have been done long ago. And we’re down to the last one!
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees