Investor material has two audiences. Your allocator and their compliance officer. Copy that satisfies the first and fails the second does not fly, which is where most drafts likely die.
Our writers have composed in that particular review before. They understand how to position verbs as recommendations, where the disclosures should be placed, and how to structure a persuasive thesis without making a claim that cannot be upheld.
An experienced reader will stop in minutes what takes an allocator dozens to read. They are looking for a clear statement of what the strategy is about and what it does and does not do. It is the crap the author includes to protect their ass that informs an allocator of your downside ignorance and, by extension, your character. If you are not including a discussion of the downside then an allocator will find it and likely assume the worst.
Request a model for investor copy and it resorts to using the verbs for recommendations. Positions transform into compelling opportunities. Past returns become expectations. A risk section is appended, which refers to something that does not actually exist. These are the sentences a compliance reviewer removes, so the draft costs more than the time it saves.
We start with your source documents. We’ll have the factsheet, last quarterly report, pitch deck, and disclosure drafting. Take the drafting that your counsel already approved. The writer will build explanation on top of material that’s been signed off rather than invent a track record, and will mark every number that requires your confirmation before that gets shared externally.
We do not consider anything we hand back to be ready for publication in its original state. Most materials for investors are regulated communications. This means that we draft communications for your approval from compliance and legal departments, with disclosure information remaining visible placeholders. Articled does not provide investment advice and does not draft financial promotions on your behalf.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical investor content | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy one-pager | 600 | $60 | $0.60 | $60.60 |
| Investor update | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Full thesis piece | 2,500 | $250 | $2.50 | $252.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Anything from 100 words up. Because you pay by the word you are never buying padding to fill a package tier.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
Every number you provide is described and labeled exactly as you describe and label it. We do not calculate returns, we do not rephrase them, we do not annualize anything. If a number is unaudited and/or preliminary, the text states as much, leaving it to no one to guess.
Yes. Provide three or four previous letters and indicate which one aligns the closest to your current style. Voice matching is a standard practice for a writer who is familiar with the archives. This is where automated drafts fall the shortest.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Most finance writers take the metaphorical pizza slice route. Our piece explained the math slowly and correctly, using the actual numbers we charge. Compliance signed it off, and they made zero changes. That has not happened in the three years during which I have done this job.
Explaining compound interest to those who left school at sixteen is difficult and this mainly tackles the issue. I requested and was given one worked example with real numbers. I wanted three, so I made two adjustments. Your definition of APR is the most comprehensible I have come across in any context.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees