Each installation guide is tested in about four minutes. Either the reader is able to develop a system that works or they open a support case. The distinction is usually a step that should have been documented as a prerequisite and a verification step that should have been added.
Our writers install the app. Where the software is publicly available, they follow their own draft on a clean machine and record anything that actually happens, even if it means documenting something that breaks in your application in unexpected ways as the happy path never mentioned it.
Most issues that arise during an installation are due to factors outside your control, such as the specific version of the operating system, permission settings, or a dependency resolution tool that behaves differently each month. Documentation that describes these variables in advance helps the user to break the installation instructions into a number of steps that decrease the workload if the user fails part of the way through the process. Then the user would know the preceding steps did not fail.
Generated install guides include releases. The package name is from version two, the config path from version four, and the flag was eliminated. Everything looks good and the sequence never completes, which takes way more time than with a guide that just says it’s wrong.
The writer erases everything on the computer in case anything in your program relies on something else. That is where your program reveals its assumptions. The next draft follows the order in which the steps actually worked, not the order your engineers recall.
Nothing ships until someone other than the author has walked through the whole thing on a clean machine. Commands aren’t entered manually. They are copied from a live terminal, one at a time. That way, misspellings, extra flags, and whatnot can’t get introduced. Version numbers of packages installed are firmly pinned to those that the author installed as opposed to the versions that exist at the time the instructions are documented.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical installation guide | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short guide | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard guide | 2,500 | $250 | $2.50 | $252.50 |
| Comprehensive guide | 5,000 | $500 | $5 | $505 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
Based on your material, we will write the guide and put a label indicating that the guide has not been tested. The writer will still be able to catch unverifiable steps and prerequisites that are missing, and we will state in the handover which commands nobody executed. It is your choice on what gets published.
We keep instructions separate, and we don’t merge them like other platforms do. Merged instructions and parenthetical asides for the other platform confuse readers with how they switch contexts. Each separate platform gets its own sequence priced by the number of words rather than as a separate order.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Before drafting, the client sent over eleven questions. Two of the questions asked about failure states that we had never documented before. Responding to these questions took me a morning to complete, but now the internal notes have improved. The guide is the second best thing that came from this order.
I sent a folder of interface screenshots and asked for callout text. Every caption matches what is actually visible in the image. Sounds basic. I have paid three other people for this and had to correct half the captions each time.
I asked the guide to be assembled in a way that a frustrated customer would think. It was harder than I expected, but it came back perfectly with the answer that half of the customers try - rebooting - placed at the begining.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees