A LinkedIn article is read by a different audience compared to a blog post published on your own site. Almost nobody finds your article by search. Generally, articles are read by people who already follow you on LinkedIn, and something in their feed encouraged them to tap, which changes what the piece has to do on the page.
Therefore, an article can assume a lot of context. It can skip the basic definitions and go straight to the disagreement. What it cannot do is read like a page written for strangers and search engines, which is how most articles posted there are still written.
An article published on LinkedIn feels natural when it reads like the long version of a point you have made out loud before. It takes a position, names the people or the ideas it disagrees with, and skips explaining what an audience in your field already knows. Written for strangers instead, it reads as filler with a byline.
Articles generated on LinkedIn hope to pass as blogs written in appropriate outfits, but fail. They start by defining a term that is already familiar to their audience, and continue through five bulleted points of consensus, and end with a summary. Readers who are already in that field quickly skim through the definition.
The idea usually exists already as a talk you have given, an internal memo, or the argument you keep making in meetings. The writer will take that argument, check what has been published on the topic recently so you are not restating a well-known piece, and build the article around the part that is yours.
Two or three articles a year establish your credibility more than weekly posts, because an article lets you be wrong at length and still have your audience. Thousands of people have made a decision about you that no feed post can formulate after working through your 4,000 word article.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical LinkedIn article | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short article | 900 | $90 | $0.90 | $90.90 |
| Standard article | 1,400 | $140 | $1.40 | $141.40 |
| In-depth article | 2,200 | $220 | $2.20 | $222.20 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
If your argument can hold up to being separated into eight distinct statements, feel free to post it. If you would like someone to follow one idea for approximately ten minutes, write your article. More often than not, people want a post when they actually want an article written. If you want to order an article, the writer will let you know before you pay.
Yes. That is the usual agreement, and we transfer copyright to you upon delivery, with no credit to us anywhere. The writer works from your material and your phrasing so you will have a solid defense if someone who knows you closely reads the piece.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Thirty captions. About eight of them are a single sentence and those are the ones that actually performed. Whoever wrote these understands that the photo is actually doing the work. No hashtags were used. Half of their one percent fee goes to planting trees, which our customers actually cared about more than we expected.
The first set was warmer and used a lot of exclamation marks, more like our tone. I sent a few examples of our tone and the revisions matched, which should have been included in the brief. Well done for turning it around in two included rounds.
This makes sense at the current price based on batch pricing. However, the generally low hit rate means that about twenty of these are very good and the rest trend toward serviceable filler. Very good steam balls are, and always have been, appreciated, and the second steeping one was one of the best examples, receiving more comments than anything we have posted.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees