Community posts need replies. Most posts get none because the prompt is usually only the moderator’s to answer. Posting about the biggest challenges of the week gets the members silence. Asking what they did the past week about a specific problem gets a lengthy response.
The difference is knowing enough about members in order to ask a specific question. Rather than inspiration, this is the part of research that is often left out when a post is written hurriedly just minutes before it’s scheduled to go out.
Members are able to tell when a post is made based on the calendar. The ones that get answered are use cases. Typically, a way that something can be improved, a tool that is overrated, or what we changed and what it cost are shared. Having a moderator that is willing to be argued with helps develops a community. A neutral prompt is likely to draw two polite replies.
Asking a model for community prompts yields thirty prompts about what is your biggest challenge this week. While these prompts are answerable in theory, in most cases the lack of response is warranted because no one is inclined to be the first respondent to a prompt without defined boundaries. Community managers will identify the lack of prompt variation.
The writer first reads the space, even the spots that were a mess. The voice of the community is established by who answers the forum questions, not a brand style guide, so we match that person. If multiple people post to the account, we develop a style everyone can use without a disparate style switch.
Communities thrive with structure. Your monthly prompt or introduction post that has become redundant, a ‘Monthly Thread Roundup’ that users have begun to expect. The beauty of our system is that it relies upon a reasonable number of posts per month, so the participation remains high enough to ensure that our members get every post that they need.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical community post | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four posts | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Ten posts, one month | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Twenty-four posts, one quarter | 2,800 | $280 | $2.80 | $282.80 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
They all work: Circle, Slack, Discourse, Skool, Mighty Networks, and plain forum software. The differences are in how the text is formatted and in how posts and threads are presented. Explain where the post could go, and the writer will change the length and structure accordingly.
This is the first follow-up to the initial post, and we do this because the first post with a single reply draws more interest than a post with no replies. Beyond this, the replies need to respond directly to what the members said, and for that reason, you either or your moderators, rather than us.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Sent over 8 of my posts as samples, and this sounds like me self edited and refreshed after a good night’s sleep and some cleaning up. That is exactly what I was paying for.
The first backsounds like press office posts. All of our founder’ posts are personal. That’s really why this account works, and I have to say, the second round was better. I still change a few phrases before I let them go. Still a good deal for the cost.
This makes sense at the current price based on batch pricing. However, the generally low hit rate means that about twenty of these are very good and the rest trend toward serviceable filler. Very good steam balls are, and always have been, appreciated, and the second steeping one was one of the best examples, receiving more comments than anything we have posted.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees