Most reports come apart at the seams between narrative and tables. The text states support for over ten thousand people, while the appendix states support for 8.412. A funder notices and the document loses its footing.
The writer begins with your figures, retains one definition for each term, and asks where that number came from before restating it. The lost results gets its own section, as funders compare each year to the previous one.
Reporting well means telling the story of the year you actually had. A program that achieved two-thirds of its target is more valuable to report than one that simply reset the target, and your funders can certainly tell the difference. A writer asks the uncomfortable question on the call. Generated text accepts whatever framing it was given and makes it seem as if it were final.
Generated reports lose track of the numbers throughout a lengthy document. The summary cites one figure, a different one is cited in the program section, and a third in the tables, all stated with the same confidence. This is only noticed when a funder’s officer lines them up in a review meeting.
Writers pull data first. After that are your monitoring sheets, finance summaries, and last years reports. This is followed with a call to find out which numbers are disputed and which case studies have consent. After that, they draft. The draft is structured so that someone can read to the end of the section and still get the point.
The level of the report is matched to how the report will be read. A summary of about 1,800 words is appropriate for a board that wants to cover the entire year within a single session. A standard annual report at 4,000 words, includes detail on the various programs and the finance narrative. An 8,000-word report for case studies and results of evaluations is appropriate when they genuinely require the space.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,800 | $180 | $1.80 | $181.80 |
| Standard annual report | 4,000 | $400 | $4 | $404 |
| Full report with case studies | 8,000 | $800 | $8 | $808 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes. Send two or three pieces you like the sound of, or your style guide. Matching an established voice is ordinary work for a writer and close to impossible for a model that has never read your back catalogue.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
Yes, if it is clear enough for us to follow. Please send the spreadsheet, the definitions for each column, and the notes. The writer will not compute new statistics or conduct an audit, and any number that the writer cannot connect to a source will not be included in the report until approved by you.
You are correct. We draft; your finance lead, your trustees, and your auditors where applicable, review the figures and any statutory content before publication. Nothing we draft is financial or legal advice. The two revision rounds exist partly so that review can send corrections straight back to the same writer.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
I got three days of quiet hopes, which is what they promised, so I only have myself to blame. Your brief is well done with appropriate hedging where evidence is lacking. My director practically ignored the nine hundred words and marked two.
Reading age was a key requirement and they nailed it almost everywhere. One paragraph still said mitigation, which no tenant uses. It took me about thirty seconds to change it myself. The remaining part is the clearest version of this page we’ve had in the last six years.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees