Definitely sounds like me, reined in a bit
Sent over 8 of my posts as samples, and this sounds like me self edited and refreshed after a good night’s sleep and some cleaning up. That is exactly what I was paying for.
Most LinkedIn users only see the first two lines of a post before the see-more link. The promise made in those first two lines is what the rest of the post has to complete.
The remaining steps are easier than most realize, as long as the writer has real things to work with. Real things can be a number or a decision that didn’t pan out. It can also be an idea that you used to have but changed your mind about. Without one of those, no structure can save the post.
Naturalness on LinkedIn is largely about being honest about what goes into something. Posts that describe a win almost look like an advertisement. Posts that describe what that win cost, including the part that went wrong, read as a person talking. That takes knowing what actually happened. This is why the writer asks uncomfortable questions before drafting anything.
LinkedIn is where generated writing is easiest to notice. The unsavory habits of the platform and a model’s default output coincide. One-line paragraphs, five-lesson lists, and a closing question nobody answers. Your post ends up indistinguishable from the others.
The majority of the work is extraction. Twenty minutes of interviewing you creates more users posts than a month of brainstorming. The reason is that these posts begin as arguments, complaints and partially formed opinions that are already in your head. The writer decides which of these will make it to the end of the writing process.
LinkedIn recognition is driven by a few repeated arguments rather than by style. Readers who can predict what you will think about recent industry news keep reading you. A position held consistently across forty posts does that, not a clever format used once.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical LinkedIn post | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single post | 200 | $20 | $0.20 | $20.20 |
| Four posts, one month | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Twelve posts, one quarter | 2,400 | $240 | $2.40 | $242.40 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
As yourself, in most instances. Personal accounts bring more reach and engagement than logos, and readers reply to people. The company page is for announcements that need to be published somewhere official. If we need to cover both, we write them separately, since identical text is rarely interchangeable.
Then it does not publish. Nothing is put out to the public or queued for release until you have approved it. Tell the writer which part you would not defend in a comment thread, and they revise it within the two rounds you are entitled to.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Sent over 8 of my posts as samples, and this sounds like me self edited and refreshed after a good night’s sleep and some cleaning up. That is exactly what I was paying for.
The first backsounds like press office posts. All of our founder’ posts are personal. That’s really why this account works, and I have to say, the second round was better. I still change a few phrases before I let them go. Still a good deal for the cost.
Twelve posts drafted from an hour of interview notes. Our CEO reads those briefs and says yes without modification, which has never happened with an outside writer. He has a habit of starting sentences with “Look” and that is in there.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees