Most business reports fail on the first page. Readers don’t want to read through eleven paragraphs of background to see what recommendation you have. A writer who has sat in those meetings would recommend you put your working behind the recommendation, rather than lead with it.
Indicate the call you need to make and the time by which you need to make it. The writer reviews your work and inserts appropriate notes and related sources and, as a result, is able to prepare a draft that can be actuated by a director without the need for a follow-up meeting.
A report stands out when it adds new information to the room. This means searching through the sales exports, support tickets, and even the pricing pages of competitors to provide a number that doesn’t currently exist. Restating the internal consensus in better prose is a waste of time for everyone, and the reader can figure this out in a minute.
Generated business reports always advise what any company could do: invest in training, improve communication, track market trends. Costing is absent, nobody takes ownership of them, and there are no due dates. The recommendations are spot on and impossible to action, so the reports get filed away to never be seen again.
Structure follows the decision. For spend approvals, the report contents are organized with the ask and the payback period. Evidence are organized in the order a skeptic would expect. The contents page is written prior to any other report elements. This is sent to you for review before any writing of the report.
Findings lead. Each one gets a heading that states the finding rather than the subject area, so a reader skimming the contents page already has the argument. Charts are described in words as well as drawn, because reports get forwarded as printouts and read on phones where axis labels disappear. findings lead. each one gets a heading that states the finding rather than the subject area, so a reader skimming the contents page already has the argument. charts are described in words as well as drawn, because reports get forwarded as printouts and read on phones where axis labels disappear.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical business report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
As detailed as the brief and the word count allow. Because you pay by the word rather than by tier, depth is a decision you make rather than a package you upgrade to. Tell the writer what the reader already knows and they will pitch it there.
Yes. Send the template, a previous example, or the structure you are required to use, and the writer works inside it. If a required section does not fit the material honestly, they will flag it rather than pad it out.
Yes, but first we must sign NDAs so that the contractor can work under a mutual NDA. With the NDAs signed, we can replace the raw data from your appendix into our working files. None of the data provided will be used for any other client, and we will delete the data when the revision window is over.
There are a couple of things explained in the draft as well why it explains itself. A report that argues a case that is undermined by its own data is worse than no report because at some point in the meeting someone will find a hole. If the finding is awkward, we word it in a careful and sensitive manner instead of burying it.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
For the first time, the board didn’t edit the executive summary. It was written based on our original survey data, and included the finding we buried on page nine, that participation was flat, but retention had doubled.
Each claim in the front section connects to a statement in the back section. Normally, our auditor finds and notes between four and five unclear sentences in the chairman’s letter. This year, there were none.
Getting housing data wrong can be frustrating. Our writer noticed two instances where the spreadsheet data contradicted the board pack data. Instead of trying to choose a side, he asked which one was right. That kind of caution is better than good writing.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees