There are now standards and regulations for claims of environmental responsibility. Value-neutral claims about carbon neutrality that previously would have gone ignored now capture public interest and spur regulatory review along with competitive and journalistic scrutiny, and the burden of proof now falls on the claimant.
So the report is written from your data, with the boundary and the baseline year stated beside each figure, and adjectives kept well away from anything you cannot evidence.
Most research is spent determining the report’s scope. Materiality is not a formality. It picks the topics that must be included, and omitting a material topic creates a report that is clear to the reader as evasive, even if the performance is positive.
Your data does not support the claims made in this sustainability copy. Committee for net-zero. Meaningful reductions. Industry-pioneering practice. Each of these statements is one that a regulator can request you provide evidence for, and the model that made these statements never saw your emissions inventory.
The writer analyzes what is measured, calculated, and estimated in your emissions data, policies, and program evidence. The report comments on the fact that scope three data is the weakest and then provides the three scopes, rather than all three scopes with confidence.
Progress against goals is reported first, even for goals that are not yet met. Statistical data quality is provided with each figure rather than in an apparently unused general note. Your report explains why a number that improved due to a boundary change is in fact a real decrease, because people comparing two years will notice this.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical sustainability report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
No, carbon accounting is the type of work that should be reserved either for your consultants or in-house team. We’ll provide a report based on the figures they produce. We will also describe the methodology and the quality of the data provided we actually produce a report. We will reach out to you should we observe any inconsistencies between different figures.
Include misses alongside achievements and add a number to each claim. Limits on superlatives help you too, if you are without evidence. Reports that note a missed target come across as more credible and are much easier to defend. If you’re looking for anything published along the same lines, please let me know. Thank you, Yours sincerely,
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Each claim in the front section connects to a statement in the back section. Normally, our auditor finds and notes between four and five unclear sentences in the chairman’s letter. This year, there were none.
For the first time, the board didn’t edit the executive summary. It was written based on our original survey data, and included the finding we buried on page nine, that participation was flat, but retention had doubled.
Three of the competitors are private and their numbers are not public. The report states this explicitly and cites what can be observed, pricing pages, job postings and packaging changes. Because of that, I trust the other parts of the report more.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees