Every draft of a policy report must be made publicly available. The person making the selections will be required to explain their reasoning on the record, and the report must be drafted in such a way that the reasoning is available in written form when the question is asked.
It means approaching the strongest version of the opposing case issue rather than the weakest, and unmistakably indicating the cost for each choice.
Policies are not chosen based on evidence alone. Cost is one element, but so are the time and difficulty to implement it, as well as the potential for it to fail. If only the evidence for something is presented, the hardest part of the decision — everything else — remains undecided, leading to decisions being made in hallways instead of via the proper procedures.
Rather than encouraging trade-offs and trade-offs among conflicting options, the balance in policy writing appears to have no real consequence. Because of this, the recommendation in the policy report suggests that a decision-maker should consult other stakeholders. Typically, there is no cost or penalty to following this recommendation, and therefore, there is no real policy. These types of reports don’t make policies that lose in a committee.
The writer compiles several sources of evidence from research, statistics, and consultations and uses your criteria against each of the options: cost, burden of implementation, equity and political acceptability. Stakeholder positions are presented in terms that they may use.
Explicit judgment is required to go from evidence to recommendation. The separation of evidence and recommendation within the report allows a dissenting recommendation reader to see precisely where that reader diverged from the authors’ line of thinking.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical policy report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
As detailed as the brief and the word count allow. Because you pay by the word rather than by tier, depth is a decision you make rather than a package you upgrade to. Tell the writer what the reader already knows and they will pitch it there.
Yes. Send the template, a previous example, or the structure you are required to use, and the writer works inside it. If a required section does not fit the material honestly, they will flag it rather than pad it out.
Yes. As long as the argument is sincere. Advocacy is valuable; misrepresenting evidence is not. The writer gives the best, true argument for your position, and shows you where the evidence is the weakest because an opponent will start there.
Yes. Send the consultation document and the writer answers the question as asked, in order, within the given limits. Responses that ignore the structure get read less carefully, and in some processes the answers are coded question by question.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Section one states the argument in its second paragraph. Every other whitepaper I have commissioned has spent a page and a half discussing the significance of the topic. This one assumes the reader knows and respects them.
Nothing overstated our position, so I’m very happy. I actually prefer that to pretty. Two lines in the emissions narrative needed counsel to amend to our regulatory filing. That’s standard, not really a problem. Four because it took a week longer.
Typically, the risk register that accompanies the feasibility study has generic entries. Ours had six risk items, each of which was linked to something in the documentation I provided, with one of them being something I had not even thought of.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees