Assuming your incident report will be published, what would you change? Probably, more concise sentences without adjectives. A pinpointing of blame is no longer as important. In the name of ease of readability, everything you learned while working in this building has been placed on this report in chronological order.
We take your statements, logs and system records and turn them into a clean sequence, marking clearly wherever accounts of the same moment differ from each other.
An incident report is credible when each statement is sourced to a witness statement, a door log, or a maintenance log. Summarizing or generalized statements are the ones challenged, and one challenged statement raises doubt for twenty surrounding it.
Speculative incident writing tends to think without meaning to. It assumes cause because that’s the nature of these reports: lack of oversight, as a result of poor communication. No one created either, and once it’s out in the open in an unprotected document it is very nearly impossible to retrieve it.
The first step in timeline creation is to order events contained in sources which include time stamps. These sources include access logs, alarms, system records, and calls. Human statements (recall) will then be placed on the created timeline. This often suggests two or three (but never more) time recollection points that are in conflict with timeline records.
Each entry is accompanied with a sequence of events, a list of sources, and a concrete description of consequential results as well as prompt responses. In the description of the results, cite any discrepancies between accounts. Recommendations, where appropriate, are in a separate section to permit the presentation of findings in a straight forward manner.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical incident report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
Yes, if the incident is severe. These reports will have to be disclosed in claims and investigations. We strive for factual defensibility in our writing and where legal input may matter, we note such passages, but we leave it to your discretion to decide on privilege and wording. This is the area that should be reserved for your counsel.
Yes, and the conflict stays in. The report includes both accounts, attributes each one, and states what the physical records reflect. Selecting between witnesses is part of an investigation, and when an incident report chooses between witnesses, it ceases to be a record.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
We cater toward detailed donors. Our writer double-checked a participation figure that looked high, and we found that we double counted a cohort. The corrected number with a report footnote explaining how we found the error was sent out. The footnote we included helped us gain more trust than putting out a good number would have.
Section one states the argument in its second paragraph. Every other whitepaper I have commissioned has spent a page and a half discussing the significance of the topic. This one assumes the reader knows and respects them.
Nothing overstated our position, so I’m very happy. I actually prefer that to pretty. Two lines in the emissions narrative needed counsel to amend to our regulatory filing. That’s standard, not really a problem. Four because it took a week longer.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees