Reports can quickly become narrations that mean little, so you’ll only want to read this report if there is some insight to be gained within the next quarter. That would mean the pricing as of the date, the two positions they are currently interviewing, the feature that was in their navigation that’s now gone, and the three combined.
All information here is public and dated. There is no pretexting, no calls under a false name, nothing that you would be ashamed of if this report was sent to the company it is about.
Most competitor work fails because of a list. Nine companies, four columns each, no conclusion. A report that changes a decision identifies the three rivals who take your deals, and suggests alternatives to consider during the sales conversation on Monday. Everything other than that should go in an appendix.
A competitor model based on your competitors’ old homepages describes how your competitors’ pages looked when the model was trained. It includes pricing changes that happened in March, product lines that were discontinued, and founders that left. It is up to date and one year behind.
The writer methodically analyzes each rival’s website, pricing, changelogs, job postings, reviews, and press coverage while keeping an evidence file and timeline. The next part of the analysis requires more interpretation. Generally, three new enterprise sales hires and a new security page indicates a likely change.
The evidence file is much longer than the report. Most of it gets discarded because a rival’s blogging rate rarely affects your decisions. What is retained is what would change a price, a roadmap item, or a sales objection, and each surviving claim retains its link and capture date.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical competitor report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
Not how we operate. The writer cites published company material that they make available to the world: websites, filings, job postings, app stores, review sites. No accounts are created under false names, no former staff are contacted, and nothing under agreements you have will be cited.
Yes, this. It should be addressed in the brief because regional competitors tend to be absent in the obvious lists. When compiling this list, the author goes beyond the usual avenues. This includes checking local filings, regional press, and currency quotes to see how they appear in the international section.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Each claim in the front section connects to a statement in the back section. Normally, our auditor finds and notes between four and five unclear sentences in the chairman’s letter. This year, there were none.
Getting housing data wrong can be frustrating. Our writer noticed two instances where the spreadsheet data contradicted the board pack data. Instead of trying to choose a side, he asked which one was right. That kind of caution is better than good writing.
Three of the competitors are private and their numbers are not public. The report states this explicitly and cites what can be observed, pricing pages, job postings and packaging changes. Because of that, I trust the other parts of the report more.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees