Did the math and caught our error
We submitted our paper and a spreadsheet. Our writer said our sample size was too small. We modified the claim. It’s a slightly bruised ego, but better paper and nobody has criticized it in public yet.
The hardest part of a trend report is subtraction. Ten things appear to be trends, two of them probably are, and one of those two is a trend that is ending. Writing about a trend that is ending is something that most people do not enjoy. A writer who has been wrong before in the past is probably being more careful with that distinction.
Each claim includes a measurement: what moved, what time period it covers, and what it was measured against, or what was the reference point. Where there is no measurement, the report calls it a hypothesis and says so.
A trend only matters insofar as it affects you making a hiring plan, a product decision, or new renewal assumptions. The report begins at those decisions, so a trend that has no impact on you is summarized in one sentence, while a trend that impacts your pricing model is the focus of a four page section.
Generated trend reports simply repeat last year’s trend lists, as that is what the internet was flooded with when the model read it. You get the trends that were being predicted rather than the trends that actually happened, and there is no text that helps you distinguish between the two.
The writer finds similar movement in at least three completely unrelated sources: a regulator’s numbers, a jobs board, and a supplier’s order book. One of the sources is a story. Three sources that independently corroborate that movement is something worth building a plan around.
Candidates who pass the three-source test go into the report. The rest go into a short section on what was assessed and rejected. Readers tend to prefer this section to findings. Every trend admitted into the report comes with a metric that, from report to report, can serve as a strong indicator of what’s to come.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical trend report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
Yes. Merging the two usually provides the strongest report. Internal movement demonstrates your experiences. External evidence demonstrates the experiences of others. The most interesting report is the one in which the two illustrations are in opposition to each other.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
We submitted our paper and a spreadsheet. Our writer said our sample size was too small. We modified the claim. It’s a slightly bruised ego, but better paper and nobody has criticized it in public yet.
The chair’s introduction and year-in-review section surpass all our internal drafts. Where it missed the mark: the writer did not draft when the finance numbers were pending. That resulted in a tight deadline for the final week. Other writers suggest using placeholder text to fill gaps.
Typically, the risk register that accompanies the feasibility study has generic entries. Ours had six risk items, each of which was linked to something in the documentation I provided, with one of them being something I had not even thought of.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees