The purpose of a policy brief is to move a rushed reader from inaction to a decision. This entails having a recommendation on the first page, followed by the evidence, and honest consideration of what the evidence leaves unsettled.
Ours are written by researchers who read the source documents, cite them by name, and mark anything they could not verify instead of writing around it. Nothing is drafted, outlined or edited by a model at any point.
You should anticipate a document that assertively takes a position. Most briefs that circulate to ministers or to the board of directors fail simply because they have been developed by a committee and have been so hedged that they no longer include a recommendation. A single author can take a position and explain the opportunity costs that would be incurred from non-acceptance.
A single recommendation usually comes before the evidence that supports it.
The options that were not selected are explained instead of just being omitted.
Each figure is linked to a specific source, with the date included.
Where AI falls down on policy briefs
Citations are the basis for evaluating policy briefs. The use of a generated text will create citations that appear to be authentic, include real agencies, plausible report titles, and fabricated page numbers. A single fabricated citation in a document bearing your logo will cost more credibility than the brief has ever gained.
Research and Writing for No-AI Policy Briefs
The writer spends more time researching than writing, so the writer tackles the legislative guidance, evaluations, and data that you reference, and then he or she looks for what contradicts that data. The argument is constructed after this process, as a brief prepared before this step is likely to argue what the writer already thought.
How a policy brief gets written here
You provide the writer with the question, the target audience, and any relevant, internal evidence as a starting point.
The writer reads the primary sources and identifies what the evidence will not be used for.
Argument and recommendation were discussed and agreed upon before the full draft was created.
Draft, reference list, and a note of unresolved gaps, then detector checks.
Final Delivery of No-AI Policy Briefs
You receive an original document instead of a locked PDF with headings aligned to your style, a numbered reference list with working links, and a note that lists every claim that the writer could not substantiate. Detector and originality reports come with it. Internal policy and law reviewers look at the brief before it is released.
Editable brief formatted according to your document template.
Numbered references with links checked in the week of delivery.
A note listing statements the author was unable to verify.
Detection and plagiarism reports included in the delivery email.
Two revisions within 14 days by the same author.
What people commission policy briefs for
Preparing committee members for an evidence session.
Providing information for trustees before making a funding decision.
Giving a position response to a green paper.
Preparing public affairs teams for meetings with ministers.
What policy briefs cost
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
Typical policy brief
Words
Writing
Fee (1%)
You pay
One-page summary brief
700
$70
$0.70
$70.70
Standard two-page brief
1,400
$140
$1.40
$141.40
Extended brief with annex
2,800
$280
$2.80
$282.80
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting.
Full pricing breakdown.
No-AI Policy Briefs Pricing FAQs
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
If there is evidence, the draft will say so and will justify it. You can choose to not accept the draft. However, we will never recommend something that the sources cannot support, as a brief that leans toward a desired answer is the one that crumbles under scrutiny.
Yes, and the author provides dates for every rule they cite, so that the reader can determine how up to date it is. Where a change has been implemented but is not yet reflected in the guidance, it goes in the covering note and is not glossed. We do not provide legal advice; your legal representative should verify the guidance.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews
What clients say about our policy briefs
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
LFLaila FPolicy Officer, Cedarline Institute
Took the full three days, but solid
I got three days of quiet hopes, which is what they promised, so I only have myself to blame. Your brief is well done with appropriate hedging where evidence is lacking. My director practically ignored the nine hundred words and marked two.
Reading age was a key requirement and they nailed it almost everywhere. One paragraph still said mitigation, which no tenant uses. It took me about thirty seconds to change it myself. The remaining part is the clearest version of this page we’ve had in the last six years.
Verified orderPublic-information pagesApril 2026
AKAdebayo KPartner, Olumide Advisory
Exactly one page, and it remained one page
One page was the brief, and one page is what was delivered, not one and a half pages in nine-point type. The cuts were the right cuts. Our methodology section went from four paragraphs to two sentences and lost nothing a prospect needs to see. The invoice was the quoted writing price plus the one percent fee, exactly as promised.