Frequency is less bothersome to users than tone. Newsletters are appreciated so long as they are not published too often. Value can be perceived in articles published only once a month. Frequency that pertains to an abundance of requests for funds reduces a newsletter’s value to many users, to the extent of electronic messages being ignored. Requests for financial support that appear at the beginning of newsletters read as demands, and users have begun to block said newsletters.
These are written by the person who understands you’ve published a few of your issues, figures out what your supporters already know, and crafts the update they’ve been waiting for, as opposed to the one the fundraising calendar requested.
A newsletter is how a supporter finds out if the thing they paid for happened. This requires specifics as in the number of nights, the name of the town, the volunteer who drove out at 6 AM. Information such as these only exist in your organization, so a writer gathers it from you, before they write anything.
When you ask a model for a supporter story, it’s going to make one up with a first name and a tragedy. It doesn’t matter that it’s a bad design. It’s a misstatement regarding your real program printed over your logo to folks who donated because they thought the last one was true.
We need your last three editions, your reader segment list, and whatever the program team has been discussing this month. Your writer will pick a story, check with you if this story is under consent, and ready the draft as a single narrative. Test draft subject lines will be included in the deck. Usually, this includes three sample subject lines.
A complete edition of a fundraising document that contains opening, main story, short update about the program, and a fundraising ask in line with the audience. It also includes HDR version design, subject lines, and preview text. Each sentence with pending consent is highlighted. In addition, this document has a revision response draft, and a story that can be reused for a different appeal.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical charity newsletter | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short email issue | 450 | $45 | $0.45 | $45.45 |
| Standard monthly newsletter | 900 | $90 | $0.90 | $90.90 |
| Quarterly print issue | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
We match the brief to a writer who has already worked in that subject area. If you have worked with an Articled writer before and want them again, name them and we will check their availability first.
Fill in the order form with your brief and email address. No account needed. You get a confirmation by email, then the finished piece as a document within 3 days.
By stating its case carefully. Supporters want to know about the instance where a program leading to an organization’s goal was stalled. Programs that only accomplish parts of an organization’s mission and never reach a goal do not interest supporters. The writer will ask what changed after the program was stalled, and will not lose sight of the person they are writing about.
We’ll want to capture them, and ask what they include: their name, photo, description, and time period. How long they want name disclosure. How much they disclosed means we can cover it. We edit and change details, and in the published copy, explain that we have done it. It goes without saying that we won’t release any name on our behalf.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
I got three days of quiet hopes, which is what they promised, so I only have myself to blame. Your brief is well done with appropriate hedging where evidence is lacking. My director practically ignored the nine hundred words and marked two.
Reading age was a key requirement and they nailed it almost everywhere. One paragraph still said mitigation, which no tenant uses. It took me about thirty seconds to change it myself. The remaining part is the clearest version of this page we’ve had in the last six years.
One page was the brief, and one page is what was delivered, not one and a half pages in nine-point type. The cuts were the right cuts. Our methodology section went from four paragraphs to two sentences and lost nothing a prospect needs to see. The invoice was the quoted writing price plus the one percent fee, exactly as promised.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees