In order for a summary to provide any value, it has to be able to conform to the standards that make a summary a generally poor practice. For example, a good summary is one that maintains the integrity of the original text. It can neither add nor subtract anything that may prove to be important. It must be able to clearly convey things that the original text may have intentionally left unresolved.
Our writers read the entire document rather than the executive summary, and mark what applies to whom, and from what date. Where a provision is ambiguous, the summary states that it is ambiguous rather than quietly selecting a reading.
Most of the confusion with a policy is not about the contents, but how it pertains to the reader. That’s why in a good summary of a policy, the first thing you want to establish is the scope: which organizations, over what threshold, from what date, and with what exemptions. When a reader understands whether the policy applies to them, understanding the obligations in order then becomes easy.
Length is where generated summaries fail quietly. Squeezing ninety pages into eight hundred words forces choices, and a model drops carve-outs and commencement dates because they read as details. Those are the two things a reader most needs.
The writer examines the source and marks down four things: who is bound by it, what is required, where every segment starts, and what is revoked or replaced. Those are the framework of the summary. Anything that is not referenced by a paragraph number is completely excluded.
Our check is a line-by-line trace. An editor will take each claim in the summary and point to the statements they find in the text. He/she will remove anything untraceable or query you with it. The draft is written in such a way that your compliance lead/legal counsel may review it before it circulates beyond your control; we make a note of this on the delivery note.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical policy summary | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-page executive summary | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard policy summary | 1,100 | $110 | $1.10 | $111.10 |
| Section-by-section breakdown | 2,400 | $240 | $2.40 | $242.40 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
Send the complete document. Usually definitions and exemptions sit in Schedules far removed from the clause they alter, and a summary from an extract will create a duty that another paragraph will remove. If it is confidential, say so, and we will sign your NDA first.
Yes, and it is often the more useful document. A comparison outlines the differences, similarities, and the items that were removed subtly. Because this takes more reading than a straight summary, you should expect the word count to be more than summary.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Compliance copy can be either overly vague or overly confidently wrong. This example is neither. The guide describes the discretion allowed by the regulation and the test to be used in those cases. In cases where the regulation does not provide discretion, the language is void and unambiguous. Internal Audit had no feedback.
I review external copy for a regulated lender, and that usually means deleting at least half of it. This had qualifiers in the right spots and no made-up stats. I only had to mark 2 sentences. That is the least I’ve marked on any outside first draft.
First draft was so brochure like, I had to say we sell to procurement teams, so we’re talking about people who are allergic to adjectives. The second draft was better because it used customer’s wording from the interview, which is what I actually wanted in the first place. Just one more round and we got it right.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees