The strictest judges of a CSR report are your employees. Staff know which programs are authentic, and which ones are primarily for the report. A report that is overly assessing the second will lose credit on all other items within the report.
We provide requests for data on attendance, spending, and outcomes at each program. We draft the ones with slim evidence at the length of the evidence.
Credibility comes from proportion. A dedicated page to a volunteering scheme used by eleven individuals vs. a single paragraph for a partnership that impacted thousands communicates to a reader that the report includes unnecessary word count. Programs take up space in a report based on the outcomes they achieve, which at times leads to an awkward internal dialogue.
Generated CSR writing is a pile of warm, disconnected statements about commitment and community with no names attached. Employees can easily identify tone-deaf statements, and the examples pre-packaged in the writing get buried in language that could be used by any organization in any industry.
The writer gathers the data for each program individually, then the case studies. The reversed order produces a report with the sections and hierarchy dictated by which program has the best photographs. That is how most of these reports are organized.
The report shows community, workplace, and giving activity initiatives and numbers. This section is followed by a brief section on what did not work. This is the section that staff read first, and overall it makes the document more credible.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical CSR report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
Audience is everything. Walls with disclosure aligned to “E” and “G” are good for investors, social programs attract employees, customers, and community partners. Combining the two is not very effective. The overlapping data can be gathered once and then used to satisfy two different audiences.
(Please be brief and include a reason) Last year’s report will be useful to those who remember it. A one line explanation will cost less credibility than no explanation at all. Significant loss of credibility is usually associated with the quiet removal of a program.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
We submitted our paper and a spreadsheet. Our writer said our sample size was too small. We modified the claim. It’s a slightly bruised ego, but better paper and nobody has criticized it in public yet.
Briefing papers tend to fail by being complete rather than useful. This one leads with the decision required, gives three options with the trade-off for each, and puts the background at the end where it belongs. Our institute requires AI-detection reports on file and they came attached to the delivery email.
Typically, the risk register that accompanies the feasibility study has generic entries. Ours had six risk items, each of which was linked to something in the documentation I provided, with one of them being something I had not even thought of.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees