A green paper is supposed to be genuinely open. If the preferred option is obvious by page three, respondents notice, engagement falls away, and the consultation gets criticized as a formality rather than a question.
So each option is written by somebody trying to make it work, and the questions at the end are ones where the answers could actually change what happens next.
An option must be balanced in order for it to be credible. This includes even length, even level of detail, and a balanced statement of each option’s pros and cons, including the option you secretly favor. Respondents can always tell when an option was included in order to be dismissed.
It is almost impossible to avoid ending green papers without concluding. The training material incorporates tons of examples that argue toward a position, so the options section devolves into recommendations, and the consultation questions end up being leading. The overall effect is that thegreen paper appears to be a question that masks a decision.
Constraints and problems are shown first because respondents need to know what an option is satisfying in order to provide a desired judgment. Options are presented evenly. Free-response consultation questions are written to provide answers that can be analyzed later.
You get background information, options to choose from, pros and cons, and a numbered set of consultation questions, along with a note on response handling. The questions are designed to be codable. A consultation where three hundred free-text essays are collected is something no one has time to or is able to properly read.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical green paper | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short paper | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
| Standard paper | 3,500 | $350 | $3.50 | $353.50 |
| In-depth paper | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
As detailed as the brief and the word count allow. Because you pay by the word rather than by tier, depth is a decision you make rather than a package you upgrade to. Tell the writer what the reader already knows and they will pitch it there.
Yes. Send the template, a previous example, or the structure you are required to use, and the writer works inside it. If a required section does not fit the material honestly, they will flag it rather than pad it out.
Yes, it is worth preplanning. In this case, especially, the same person writes the questions and then later answers them. When the author publishes questions that they will later answer, the questions tend to be constructed with an eye toward coding, which makes the analysis faster and the summary more useful.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Nothing overstated our position, so I’m very happy. I actually prefer that to pretty. Two lines in the emissions narrative needed counsel to amend to our regulatory filing. That’s standard, not really a problem. Four because it took a week longer.
Section one states the argument in its second paragraph. Every other whitepaper I have commissioned has spent a page and a half discussing the significance of the topic. This one assumes the reader knows and respects them.
We cater toward detailed donors. Our writer double-checked a participation figure that looked high, and we found that we double counted a cohort. The corrected number with a report footnote explaining how we found the error was sent out. The footnote we included helped us gain more trust than putting out a good number would have.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees