We provide the commentary, not the accounting. Numbers come from either your finance team or your accountants. We write the explanation of why gross margin moved two points…this is for a board member that hasn’t studied finance.
Their answer to that is simple. They say composing answers to the responses most finance teams assume to be obvious when asked questions is one of the many reasons their final drafts are readable by everyone except those finance teams.
Analyzing finance documents involves reading commentary and scanning tables, which is why people can determine whether to attend a meeting based on the commentary. There is no need to opaquely hedge comments because in the end, the document’s worth is more about the details of what moved and by what rationale, rather than the careful degree of hedging.
Phrasing designed to be generic and appeal to as many stock causes as possible include ‘margin pressure’ and ‘macro headwinds’ and ‘timing differences.’ Those apply to almost any set of accounts. That’s the tell. No account has margin pressure because you got hit by a backwards repricing — that comes with a ‘when did you ask the question?’
The author starts with your management accounts and an accompanying short call with the account preparer. Every explanatory sentence gets checked back to the ledger extract. Anything that cannot reconcile gets asked about it directly, rather than paraphrasing it to use safe vagueness.
Draft commentary went to your finance lead with the reconciliations, so we’ll take this as an approval. We don’t sign off on anything, and when a statement has regulatory significance, a note is left for your accountants and lawyers to review it before it is published.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical financial report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
As detailed as the brief and the word count allow. Because you pay by the word rather than by tier, depth is a decision you make rather than a package you upgrade to. Tell the writer what the reader already knows and they will pitch it there.
Yes. Send the template, a previous example, or the structure you are required to use, and the writer works inside it. If a required section does not fit the material honestly, they will flag it rather than pad it out.
That will not happen and we will put it in writing. Our writers are not accountants, auditors or licensed advisors. We explain the figures your finance function produced and approved. Anything needing a professional opinion is flagged for your accountant rather than having us answer it.
You do, and the draft is designed to make this happen. Each figure in the commentary is hyperlinked to its corresponding schedule. This means your finance lead can tick off a reconciliation rather than read through the entire document once again, line by line.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
The narrative was strong, and the board approved of it without any changes or comments. Two chart captions had the wrong year, and while I can say I caught it, I shouldn’t have to. They fixed it within an hour of me pointing it out. The rest of the report was in good order.
We anticipated the typical one-sided whitepaper on heat pump retrofits, but this one actually named the two building types for which the economics do not work. Sales Initially pushed back against this whitepaper, but it is now the asset type that converts best because engineers trust it.
Briefing papers tend to fail by being complete rather than useful. This one leads with the decision required, gives three options with the trade-off for each, and puts the background at the end where it belongs. Our institute requires AI-detection reports on file and they came attached to the delivery email.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees