You have probably seen hundreds of essays. A reflective journal, a case analysis, a lab report without a discussion section: you have to produce all of these at some point, and you’ve probably never read an exemplary example. The conventions are strict and unwritten.
A model assignment demonstrates the purpose of each section. For example, how to accurately differentiate a results section from a discussion, where to give a reflective piece its evidence to avoid a more confessional one, or even where in a case analysis we should be committing to a recommendation.
Format guidelines mark things that are missing. A lab report that interprets data in the results section is penalized because there is no explicit statement about why that is wrong. Rather than a template, seeing an example of correct format (at least once) is more beneficial because a template shows the name of a section. It doesn’t show what is wrong below that.
Generated case studies invent the case. Numbers appear that no source produced, a company behaves in a way it never did, and a reflective piece describes a placement nobody attended. In formats built on real evidence, invented specifics are the whole failure.
What format have you been set, and how does your departmental handbook describe it? The reflective essay differs greatly in appearance from one university to the next. The assignment will be designed around the data case you provide and each section will do its assigned task, nothing more.
This will help you learn the overall structure. Once you have the overall structure, you can fill in the specifics from your own resources. This is more important in lab reports and case studies than in essays since these rely more heavily on your personal experience and evidence. You cannot submit a model based on someone else’s data, even if you want to.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical model assignment | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| In-depth | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Yes, and that is the better option. Send the data, the brief, and any outputs from your analysis software, and the report writer will include your data in their report, rather than guessing and providing examples.
We’re accepting submissions of lab and technical reports, case analyses, reflective journals, annotated portfolios, business plans, policy briefs and placement write-ups among other things. If your brief refers to a format we have not described, please submit and we will tell you honestly if we know someone to fill it.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Being a substitute is easy when you have good lesson plans. The lesson plans I’ve purchased before have realistic time estimates for their forty-minute activities falling into thirty-five-minute sections. There are clear back up activities written for the long sections. Clearly, someone has been in front of a classroom before writing the plan.
This is about reading level. A lot of people, including most writers, become inadvertently more formal after around page two. This piece retained the level of formality throughout. I checked it with a class before approving it.
28 sources, this time grouped by methodology rather than in order which I requested and rarely get. Two of the papers I hadn’t found. My supervisor only commented on my own framing.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees