Most low marks aren’t caused by bad writing. The cause is usually answering the question differently (even though it is the correct answer), and then presenting a reasonable defense for this. By the time feedback is given, the comment is typically short and to the point: does not address the question.
Guidance is a reading of your brief before you start. What evaluate requires that discuss does not, which rubric criteria carry the most marks, and the assumption buried in the question that you are supposed to notice.
Reading someone else’s outline can give you some perspective on how to write your own, but you’re expected to figure out how to read a brief on your own, which most students don’t know how to do. The more briefs you read that are properly built, the easier they become. Unfortunately, the people who buy finished essays never get the opportunity to learn to read a brief.
A model has no context when it runs your brief. It cannot suggest the module it is in, what was discussed in week four, the tutor’s preferences. It makes strong recommendations on structural issues and misses the fact that this department prefers primary data and nothing else.
The writer uses the brief and module handbook you provided to rewrite the question in simpler terms and notes what needs to be included to answer the question completely and what students tend to leave out when answering. The writer also identifies where the brief is unclear and provides their best understanding of what should be asked to the tutor.
This is an explanation of what you need to do, not the content you need to submit. You are responsible for the content you submit. If your institution asks whether you had assistance, they will see reading a brief with another person as study support, and every university writing center provides this service.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical assignment guidance | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outline | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Detailed plan | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Full structure | 2,500 | $250 | $2.50 | $252.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
No, and anyone promising a predicted grade is guessing. What a writer can do is map your draft against the rubric and say which criteria are clearly evidenced and which are not. That is more useful than a number and considerably more honest.
Yes. Different formats for reports, case studies, reflections, presentations and portfolios have specific conventions and ways in which they might be misread. If you can provide a summary of the brief, we can see if we have someone who has written or assessed that particular format in the past.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Knowledge of the subject was excellent. The timings, however, were not. Three activities that would easily take fifty minutes were allotted thirty minutes time, which is something all teachers would notice. It was fixed after I mentioned it. Everything else, particularly the differentiation notes, saved our team a lot of time.
The content was clearly well organized. I asked for Harvard style referencing, but it was returned to me in APA style, which took one email and maybe half a workday to fix. That work, particularly the way it handled counterarguments, was unparalleled. The detection reports came along too, which is standard for my department.
I had hit a wall on two papers behind paywalls. Rather than skipping them or paraphrasing the abstracts, the writer found the accessible preprints, used those, and said so in a note. Small thing. It is the thing that told me a person did this.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees