Training adults is not teaching students. Since the people in the room are already engaged in the task, the process needs to describe how the task is already accomplished in order to offer how the new method is better, otherwise the presentation becomes a defense of the old method and no one says this out loud.
These examples are written around the activities people do in their daily lives, rather than what happens in a typical office. The scenarios and activities in the exercises come from the room rather than a generic office, and the situations are recognized by the majority of the room in the first two lines.
Compliance training doesn’t work because it’s written defensively. It only skims the regulation leaving out what you should say when an awkward customer asks you a question on a Friday at 4pm. Training that actually affects behavior is specific about the hard to follow situations.
Generated training strictly states what typically happens and what doesn’t happen in most organizations. It cannot say that your organization uses a certain system or that approval is in one specific role or that the policy change happened in March, therefore the room will stop trusting it early.
Beginning with what learners currently do and what must change is often a result of a short conversation with someone who performs that function. Content is developed around the real decisions that people encounter, messy examples included rather than clean examples that make a slide look neat.
Since you purchased the material outright, you are able to rebrand it, divide it into separate modules, or even assign it to an external course facilitator with no need for a licensing discussion. After the first delivery, list the questions that learners had, because those questions will point you to the gaps, and two rounds of revisions will address those gaps.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical training material | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single lesson | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Unit of work | 2,500 | $250 | $2.50 | $252.50 |
| Full scheme | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Please say upfront so I can explain how this would affect the writing. Facilitator notes become much longer. Questions have answers attached. Anything requiring specialized judgment gets flagged as a point to escalate, rather than something to improvise.
We’ll send content in the form of screen text, narration scripts and knowledge check question scripts in a document that your authoring platform can take in. It is generally faster for the developer to build it within their own platform.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
I’ve been reading in this area for a year and a half. This review found three new papers for me, including one from 2019 that completely contradicts what I’ve been saying. Annoying, but useful, and it’s what I paid for.
Corrections are often accompanied by notes, and about a third of the notes are short explanations. I’ve learned more about comma splices from this one document than from three years of tutoring and feedback.
The learning goals align with the scheme of work, and the differentiation notes are useful. It looks like you’re anticipating a classroom that settles in about two minutes, and two minutes is a dream. Most likely an easy fix for our teachers, but it shows a lack of recent teaching experience.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees