An annotation will evaluate an argumentative source in around 150 words by stating the argument, the strength of the argument, and how the source will benefit the overall project. For brevity, most annotators will state the argument of a source and stop there. This is why most annotated material is written in blurbs.
Each word has a specific price, meaning you buy annotations units. One hundred and fifty words per source is twelve sources, for an 1800-word total. This math can be done before you make a purchase.
The student example that the tutors grade is the appraisal sentence. Judgment is required there. In this sentence for the example, the student states that a study had a self-selected online sample of ninety respondents, and that therefore it is limited in what it can say of the larger population. This sentence shows some level of judgment, which is what the example is designed to capture. A summary on its own reveals only that a person has read the abstract.
Generated annotations are interchangeable. Each states that the source provides insight and a framework that was helpful, as the model had the title and not the methods section. Fifteen entries in, a marker has noticed that none of them mention a sample size.
Sources are read rather than skimmed, because the method section is typically where the study’s limitation is disclosed. Each source is consistent in its internal structure in order to allow for comparison of multiple sources more easily, citation in the preferred format is provided, then annotations are written.
Annotated bibliographies are often used as assessed work. Before ordering, check what your brief outlines. If it is used as a research tool, it is yours to use as you see fit. If your annotated bibliography will be assessed, consider what we have given you as an example. Write your own entries, basing your work on the sources themselves.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical annotated bibliography | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short list | 250 | $25 | $0.25 | $25.25 |
| Standard | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Extensive | 1,500 | $150 | $1.50 | $151.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
About 150 words, which is the typical length in most briefs. If yours is 75 words or 300 words, please let us know and we will adjust the length of the order accordingly, since you will be charged by the word.
Yes. Everything from MLA to Chicago to IEEE to the variants of specific departments is acceptable. If your department has a guide, I’d recommend you send it along. You have to keep in mind that Harvard, especially, varies a lot from one place to another.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
They’re not summaries. Each entry explains how the source relates to my argument and where it contradicts another source on the list. Forty entries. It reorganized my reading rather than recording it.
The learning goals align with the scheme of work, and the differentiation notes are useful. It looks like you’re anticipating a classroom that settles in about two minutes, and two minutes is a dream. Most likely an easy fix for our teachers, but it shows a lack of recent teaching experience.
The methods section appears to be written from the perspective of someone actually conducting the study as it addresses sampling, limitations, ethics, etc. The significance section was too general and would be much better if written specifically for my field of study, as only I know what would interest my colleagues the most. It actually led to less work for me.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees