A thesis will be evaluated by 2-3 people who will require you to verbally defend some sentences. This redefines editing. Now you have to be prepared to defend every statement you make, and the most common reason for people to lose time is from overclaiming.
So an editor working on a thesis reads for defensibility as well as clarity. Where a sentence claims more than the data supports, it gets flagged rather than smoothed, because an examiner will find it whether or not the prose flows.
The contribution being studied is generally invisible. It is mentioned once in the abstract (with proper hedging, of course) so the reader has no idea of the originality. The editor finds all the places it should be re-stated, and was not, because the examiners check the introduction, each chapter, and the conclusion for it.
The editing shown in this example gets it slightly backwards. Edits should remove qualifiers. However, here we see the results of each iteration. In step one, while results show association (which would be unexpected), the authors state in the first iteration that results show only a possible association. You can expect to spend about twenty minutes of your viva taking apart that sentence.
The editor reads the entire thesis once over and writes an examiner’s-eye report noting the contributions, the support offered by the chapters, and the claims that extend beyond the evidence provided. Allotted Line by Line edits follow and tend toward the conservative end of the spectrum when dealing with doctoral level text, as general editors tend to level modifications on the prose of this level.
Doctoral regulations on third-party editing are usually more rigorous than those on editing of undergraduate submissions and may even request a declaration. Please read your regulations, declare the editing as necessary, and ensure that you keep a note of our correspondence. We do not write any new material and do not build any arguments. We will confirm this in writing if your institution asks.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical thesis editing | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
No. Everything we publish is drafted and revised in English. If your statement is in another language, an editor here would have no way of knowing whether a claim is overstated, and evaluating that generally accounts for most of this service.
Yes, that’s a common request. Send the examiners’ report with the thesis. The editor can verify that corrections are made for the exact wording of the requirement rather than trying to guess what the requirement means.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
An interview before this writing took an hour and had more to do with other things than my grades. The feedback that followed includes a lead with an example I would have thought too small to cite. I received an offer.
Your proposal has passed our committee on the first read this time. Our reviewer said the sampling rationale was clear in your proposal. It is good that the originality reports came with the submission email without having to request them myself since it matters more than it should in my department.
They’re not summaries. Each entry explains how the source relates to my argument and where it contradicts another source on the list. Forty entries. It reorganized my reading rather than recording it.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees