In investor relations, text is graded more on consistency than on quality. If the site lists four growth drivers, the presentation deck lists three, and the results release mentions a fifth, this inconsistency is then brought up (and questioned) on the earnings call and the response is hardly ever pleasant or comfortable for IR.
We treat the equity story as a fixed text and everything else as an expression of it. The writer builds a wording bank first, then writes the site pages, the release narrative and the deck notes out of that same vocabulary.
Analysts and portfolio managers do not read your reports cover to cover. The elements that help them include a definition of a segment in three different places, a KPI that is defined once and then used consistently, and a page that identifies what the business does before stating what the business aspires to do. While each different version of the page is well written, using new phrasing each quarter indicates that the page is unstable and gives the appearance of a lack of continuity.
A model rewrites, not repeats, which is precisely the wrong instinct here. Ask for four investor relations pages, and you’ll receive four descriptions of the same strategy, four phrasings of one KPI, and a forward-looking statement it created itself instead of the one your counsel approved.
The writer examines the last four quarters of releases, the most recent presentation, and the most current call transcript, because the transcript is where the valuable phrasing is located. Then, they prepare a bank of phrasing options for strategy, segments, and KPIs, and secure approval for it before writing even one page of text.
Please find the wording bank attached for all users to reference. Forward looking statements are marked for your counsel’s approval and positioning. We do not draft disclosures, determine materiality or advise in respect of the contents that should be in a release.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical investor-relations copy | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR site page | 400 | $40 | $0.40 | $40.40 |
| Equity story page | 900 | $90 | $0.90 | $90.90 |
| Results narrative | 1,800 | $180 | $1.80 | $181.80 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
We match the brief to a writer who has already worked in that subject area. If you have worked with an Articled writer before and want them again, name them and we will check their availability first.
Up to 3 days. The writer has to read around the subject before writing it, so we quote honestly rather than promising an hour. If your deadline is tighter, say so in the brief and we will tell you before you pay whether we can meet it.
Yes, and it’s the more cost-effective approach. With an available wording bank, a quarterly update becomes typically just a couple hundred words of new data and one revised paragraph, billed at the same word rate as any other content we produce.
Below, you’ll find the narrative that supports the rest of the document we are working on: the summary, the review, the outlook. Tables, accounting language, and the decisions you make during the disclosure process will remain with your finance and legal teams. They will approve the full release prior to it being disseminated.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Most finance writers take the metaphorical pizza slice route. Our piece explained the math slowly and correctly, using the actual numbers we charge. Compliance signed it off, and they made zero changes. That has not happened in the three years during which I have done this job.
Explaining compound interest to those who left school at sixteen is difficult and this mainly tackles the issue. I requested and was given one worked example with real numbers. I wanted three, so I made two adjustments. Your definition of APR is the most comprehensible I have come across in any context.
Two out of four outlets put your article out exactly like it was in our lead paragraph. Every other lead-in has either ignored or rewritten our releases. What’s notable here is that our lead-in this time was our measurement change, while in the past it was company achievement.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees