A field report has value when a reader can distinguish fact from the observer’s conclusion. Most drafts confuse the three and beget a single, unmoving paragraph. Value along with distinction goes out the window. #Rewrite #Biology #Academic
We use your notes, photos, videos, etc. We don’t include anything not provided by you. We build from your notes, photos, videos, etc.
Details in a well-substantiated field report are dull and precise. The report reads: “07:40”, “overcast”, “ground still wet from rain the night before”, “access north gate, site manager there”. Sound dull? Wait until investigators dispute a given finding, at which time those details become the reason the report holds.
A model has never been to your site, so it writes what these reports usually say: the area appeared well maintained, no significant issues were observed. A generic observation is basically the same as no observation at all, and a report consisting of these is of no use whatsoever.
The writer starts with your timeline, putting together the notes in the order they happened, and reorganizes the notes sectioned by topic for the reader. Rather than making a guess to answer the ambiguous points, the writer asks the only person who can answer for those points, the observer.
The report has visit details in an order that a reader can follow, includes observations, references photos from the text, and includes a clearly labeled observer’s opinion section. It has a list of answers to questions that could not be answered on site for the next visit.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical field report | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary report | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard report | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
| In-depth report | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Primary sources wherever they exist — your own data, published research, filings, regulator and industry figures — with secondary reporting used only where nothing better is available. Everything used is listed with links so you can check it.
We write the analysis, label what each figure shows and describe the charts your designer should build, including the takeaway each one has to land. We do not produce finished graphics, so tell us if you need the underlying numbers laid out for a designer.
No. We write, we do not inspect. Observations must come from you or your inspector. Reports only carry weight if the observer stands behind the observations. Send us notes, photos, or voice memos from your visits and we will be happy to draft the report for you.
About three days after observation, answers will still come to memory. That works with the three day allowance. You’ll have to rely on written notes months later and that’s where you’ll have to fill in the blanks as best you can. That’s what each detail of a challenge will analyze first when answering.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
We anticipated the typical one-sided whitepaper on heat pump retrofits, but this one actually named the two building types for which the economics do not work. Sales Initially pushed back against this whitepaper, but it is now the asset type that converts best because engineers trust it.
The narrative was strong, and the board approved of it without any changes or comments. Two chart captions had the wrong year, and while I can say I caught it, I shouldn’t have to. They fixed it within an hour of me pointing it out. The rest of the report was in good order.
We submitted our paper and a spreadsheet. Our writer said our sample size was too small. We modified the claim. It’s a slightly bruised ego, but better paper and nobody has criticized it in public yet.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees