Definitely sounds like me, reined in a bit
Sent over 8 of my posts as samples, and this sounds like me self edited and refreshed after a good night’s sleep and some cleaning up. That is exactly what I was paying for.
A founder post is engaging because of what the founder knows, which makes the writing job mostly an extraction job. Nobody else can write your churn number, the hire that did not work out, or the pricing decision you reversed after four months.
First, we do interviews. It takes around thirty to forty-five minutes to gather enough content to publish posts for an entire month, and it even generates the styles that each post needs. This is why the posts that are written about the founder based on his interviews read like the founder, but the posts about the founder written based on briefings do not.
The test is whether a post survives a name swap. Replace the name of your competitor in the post and if nothing changes, then the post is not related to your company. In competitor posts that fail this test, there will be a certain number, date, and decision that is directly related to a single business.
Generated founder posts create lessons without attached companies. Five things I learned building a startup, none of which happened. The absence is specific and easy to see: no number, no date, no name, and no cost. Readers who have run something stop after one line.
The call is the process. A writer asks you what you have changed your mind about, what last quarter cost you, and what argument you have with your team on a regular basis. They sort the answers into what you can publish, what you can publish with caution, and what you have to never have leave the room.
For founders and individuals alike, it’s about a matter of repetition—getting known for a couple examples repeated over a year. It’s much quicker to establish a pattern of two or three arguments you enjoy defending and applying to whatever comes up each month, versus trying to establish a pattern for a wider array of examples. We adopt the pattern with you and stick to it.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical founder post | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single post | 250 | $25 | $0.25 | $25.25 |
| Four posts, one month | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| Twelve posts, one quarter | 3,000 | $300 | $3 | $303 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
It takes one call of thirty to forty-five minutes a month and about fifteen minutes of reading drafts to produce four posts. Voice note check-ins between calls help to tick off the posts and shorten call length.
It is gone with just a saying so. There is no reason to keep it apart from writing from it. Everything is sifted through a filter to see what is potentially publishable prior to any drafting. Anything you excise after seeing a draft is included in the two revision rounds.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Sent over 8 of my posts as samples, and this sounds like me self edited and refreshed after a good night’s sleep and some cleaning up. That is exactly what I was paying for.
The first backsounds like press office posts. All of our founder’ posts are personal. That’s really why this account works, and I have to say, the second round was better. I still change a few phrases before I let them go. Still a good deal for the cost.
The first set was warmer and used a lot of exclamation marks, more like our tone. I sent a few examples of our tone and the revisions matched, which should have been included in the brief. Well done for turning it around in two included rounds.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees