Most communication with shareholders is due to something that happens that the shareholders do not have control over. This could be a change in dividends, a rights issue, a recommendation of the board regarding an offer. The writing must make sense to a retail shareholder, but must not provide a legal team anything to worry about. Senior Manager Investor Relations BS Invest. Info. Systems Manager PR & IR Canada, London
The two goals contradict each other, and lawyers usually win, leading to unreadable letters. On the other hand, our writers collaborate straight from the first draft with attorneys to avoid erasure of the plain-language draft of the letter.
The audience is not one audience. Institutions read the note and the numbers. Retail holders read the letter, and for them, that’s where it ends. Effective communication tells both audiences the same information, in order, for someone who owns 400 shares and is interested in knowing what effects them. Anything that requires an additional communication to interpret doesn’t work.
This format is judged for what it does not soften. A generated draft turns a dividend cut into a capital allocation update and moves the number to the fourth paragraph. Holders notice the evasion before they notice the news, and then the evasion becomes the news.
The writer begins with the announcement and the resolution wording and determines what a holder must decide or do. Subsequently, the letter is drafted around that decision. Background explanation comes afterwards, not first. Rather than arriving as a round of deletions, both legal and company secretarial input come during the drafting stage.
Timing and consistency are the essence of this format. The letter must say what the announcement says, be addressed to all holders, and be sent within the time your advisers indicated. The letter is prepared for your company secretary, counsel, and brokers, to approve before issuance, and we do not provide guidance on disclosure obligations and timing of releases.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical shareholder communication | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholder letter | 600 | $60 | $0.60 | $60.60 |
| Proxy or AGM letter | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Transaction circular narrative | 2,500 | $250 | $2.50 | $252.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
We match the brief to a writer who has already worked in that subject area. If you have worked with an Articled writer before and want them again, name them and we will check their availability first.
Up to 3 days. The writer has to read around the subject before writing it, so we quote honestly rather than promising an hour. If your deadline is tighter, say so in the brief and we will tell you before you pay whether we can meet it.
That is our first choice. With a writer in the review loop for each draft, it results in a letter that remains intact after edits. A plain-language draft sent to counsel cold is returned retyped to the version you are trying to avoid.
Yes, under NDA to one named writer. No material will be shared beyond that writer and an editor. Nothing is held beyond the engagement. We will abide by whatever restrictions your advisers set. We do not advise what is considered price sensitive.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Most finance writers take the metaphorical pizza slice route. Our piece explained the math slowly and correctly, using the actual numbers we charge. Compliance signed it off, and they made zero changes. That has not happened in the three years during which I have done this job.
Explaining compound interest to those who left school at sixteen is difficult and this mainly tackles the issue. I requested and was given one worked example with real numbers. I wanted three, so I made two adjustments. Your definition of APR is the most comprehensible I have come across in any context.
They asked for something that didn’t include passionate or results-driven. I submitted 280 words about my poorly executed bridge inspection contract and the changes I made after the contract. It was an exposure draft. The hiring manager read it out to me during the interview. He said should have quoted the draft as an example of my work. I mentioned in the interview that I learned from this contract that I have to think more in advance and plan for the next steps which I hope he remembered.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees