A mock should emulate the characteristics of the paper on which it is based. This means it should have a similar number of questions, distribution of marks, balance of short answer and extended response questions, and a total that can be answered in the allotted time.
Timing is everything and getting it wrong teaches the wrong lesson. An example of this is a student who takes ninety minutes to do a paper that takes sixty minutes to do. This student will believe that they take a long time to do everything and that they are slow when in fact they take a longer time to do a harder task.
Mark schemes are a teaching tool. Self-marking with a scheme lets students find out the reason they scored the mark they got, with students being able to find out why their answer merited the mark they scored (or, in some cases, why it scored the mark it did). Having a scheme with a mock exam helps determine the areas in which a student struggles rather than simply putting their mood on a scale.
Mock exams do not follow the right mark distribution formula. Questions may be worth six marks with three points to discuss, and then the total score on that paper may be 72, when the real score is 80. calculations may also lead a student to think that they have thirty minutes remaining when in fact, they should be leaving to submit the paper.
The writer matches the papers you provide, and after analyzing the documents, assigns scores based on question type and topic. The mock is built based on the score pattern. Questions are newly drafted rather than adapted because, should a student half remembers a previous paper, he or she is likely to get misleading scores. The mark scheme is given alongside each question.
Do not attempt to fake it. Expose your cheating device to the real world. Leave your phone out during an open-book mock and expect a score that will deserve no respect. Only then should you prefer to mark your work yourself against the scheme; the learning occurs during the marking.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical mock exam | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single lesson | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Unit of work | 2,500 | $250 | $2.50 | $252.50 |
| Full scheme | 6,000 | $600 | $6 | $606 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Yes. Reusing published questions removes any valuable indication of effort for anyone who has seen the questions before, and copying a board’s paper is a clear case of copyright infringement. The writer matches the profile and style of the real paper while writing entirely new questions.
We do not offer a marking service. We believe that the best use of a student’s time is to mark their own answers with our mark scheme. This provokes the student to argue with our mark scheme, which is where troublesome misunderstandings are addressed.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
The learning goals align with the scheme of work, and the differentiation notes are useful. It looks like you’re anticipating a classroom that settles in about two minutes, and two minutes is a dream. Most likely an easy fix for our teachers, but it shows a lack of recent teaching experience.
The methods section appears to be written from the perspective of someone actually conducting the study as it addresses sampling, limitations, ethics, etc. The significance section was too general and would be much better if written specifically for my field of study, as only I know what would interest my colleagues the most. It actually led to less work for me.
I’ve been reading in this area for a year and a half. This review found three new papers for me, including one from 2019 that completely contradicts what I’ve been saying. Annoying, but useful, and it’s what I paid for.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees