The objective of a how-to is for the reader to accomplish the task. If a how-to doesn’t achieve this end, then small details don’t matter. For example, if you refer to a menu as “sidebar” and you type step 4, it ends the task and sends them back to search for the solution.
Our writers do what’s necessary first. They indicate where they got stuck, what the actual interface says for this step, and point to places where people tend to skip. Then our writers start laying it out in a step by step manner. What steps do you take to complete coding “research” that you get done okay?
Instructions fail at the joints: the prerequisite nobody mentioned, the setting that moved in the last release, the step that only works if you did something optional three steps earlier. Those gaps are invisible to anyone who has not done the task, and text assembled from other people’s write-ups inherits every one of them.
Unbuilt software instructions explain the software as it was developed, not as it is currently. In the meantime, buttons get renamed, settings get moved, menus become collapsed into new panels, and the model has no way to know about this because he/she never opened the product. The steps seem to flow and collapse at step three.
The author takes wonky scenarios and uses them to walk through each step while jotting down notes. The author even captures the two minutes lost to a lengthy dialog box friction. The useful part of all this friction is the warning line under step two that stops users from bothering support by sending email.
Give us the brief, the reader’s starting knowledge, and access to whatever they may need. This would make a substantial difference and we will ask for it. Order by form, pay by the word, and in three days we will return a draft.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical how-to article | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quick how-to | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Standard how-to | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Detailed walkthrough | 1,800 | $180 | $1.80 | $181.80 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
We provide a detailed description of how you should screenshot each component of the given example and include the state of the display. We do not include the images. Because your site should showcase your own build, theme, and demo data, we would assume you would populate the page with your data.
Please send the release note within the fifteen-day revision period. Once the writer has that, they will update the affected steps. Following that, we will quote for the edit. In case of a button name change, this cost will be very close to what you actually paid.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
The quality I had no problems with. The timing was way off. I thought a 900 word how-to would show up in a day, and I had to use up the whole three days. My bad for not checking the delivery terms. There was one measurement that had to be fixed, and that one came back in a couple of hours.
This how-to is for a setup that changed in the last release. The author must have done it because step 6 references a dialog that comes up only if you skip the optional plugin. You can’t fake that detail.
Thought leadership is typically an overview of what is already commonplace. This essay takes a stance in favor of warehouse automation, and even has a paragraph in addressing the automation argument. Given this pushback in the comments, that is actually the goal.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees