Minutes distill discussion points to facilitate memory. They act as a reminder of attendance, objections, and outcomes one year later when everyone but the secretary has left the room. This is the occasion when they take on the most significance, and most people have no idea their purpose until a dispute arises.
For accuracy vs readability, accuracy wins every time. When the minutes say “Four to Three,” that’s what is captured. You will find the minutes recording the item was deferred because there were no numbers brought.
Because someone taking minutes cannot be participatory, this job is-somewhat jokingly-given to the employee who is the least involved in the meeting. To no one’s surprise, this results in the minutes being poor. Getting a writer to take the minutes gets you an overview of the decisions that were made and the actions agreed upon with the discussion; the record of suggestions that were made and ultimately agreed upon, and also promotes the record of actions and decisions as done.
Automatic summarizers can do irrevocable things in minutes including smoothing. With smoothing, a contested vote becomes agreement, a remark lands with the wrong speaker, and actions are attributable to someone for which they were disowned. In the case of a document that is to be used as evidence, only in appearance does tidy and wrong beat nothing.
The different conventions of governance minutes, safety committee minutes, and project minutes means work is best sent to an experienced writer. The writer will either transcribe from your recording or notes and query anything that is illegible or uncertain. The draft will be ready for the chair’s approval once completed.
Include notes and/or recording from the meeting, attendee list, and any format your organization prefers as any standing format. No account required. When there’s a series that runs monthly, the same writer carries over the numbering and action log from the previous month and continues working on it rather than starting anew.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical meeting minute | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brief | 250 | $25 | $0.25 | $25.25 |
| Standard | 600 | $60 | $0.60 | $60.60 |
| Detailed | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes — 2 rounds are included, for 14 days after delivery, handled by the writer who wrote the piece rather than by someone new to the brief.
Yes, by assigning someone who already knows the subject rather than someone who will research it overnight. If we do not have the right specialist available we will tell you rather than take the brief and hope.
Using recording/transcript/your notes. We do not send a person to sit in the room with you. The writer will not insert a guess. A query mark is placed instead to be resolved by the chair before the minutes are approved.
This is less than most write, but it is more than a summary. The test is whether a reader two years later can understand who decided, what was decided, and on what basis. Discussing in near-verbatim form usually does not help and tends to create more issues later on.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees