Someone without an executive title reads your paper on a Sunday night along with eleven others, without all the context you have carried around leading up to this time. They’re looking to see what they’re being asked to approve and what the potential risks are.
There aren’t many things I need to say beyond those two answers, and everything else exists to support those answers. A paper that makes the board hunt for the ask is already fifteen minutes of their time wasted.
You will find the decision, recommendation, an explanation of other options, reasons for rejection, and the estimated financial and risk implications in this report. You will not find the model calculations; however, non-executive members of the board will be able to see all necessary information without the use of a calculator. You will want to include what details you left out, as that is the first thing the board will ask about.
Board papers that only state a recommendation without noting what was lost lead non-executive directors to wonder what else was in it. The function of board papers is to capture points of consideration and recommend. In the absence of that, this seems like a decision already made or, even worse, work left undone.
To avoid unnecessary friction while going over your submission, the writer goes over the last three papers on the same subject. Boards will most likely remember what they were told last. Constructive feedback would be appreciated, but inconsistency is costly. Numbers get reconciled to management accounts and anything that cannot be reconciled is flagged back to you as opposed to being published as is.
Complete and corrected house format papers come as an editable document to build your own pack. Cover sheets and appendices are separated and delivered with reports from detectors by email in three days. Two revision rounds allow for addresses to the comments of the chair.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical board paper | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| In-depth | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes — 2 rounds are included, for 14 days after delivery, handled by the writer who wrote the piece rather than by someone new to the brief.
Yes, by assigning someone who already knows the subject rather than someone who will research it overnight. If we do not have the right specialist available we will tell you rather than take the brief and hope.
Yes. Please send over the cover letter template and two examples of recently reviewed papers. Boards have developed preferences with respect to their cover letters, and a paper that ticks off the risk rating or ordering of sections is sometimes remarked upon before the quality of the content is assessed.
Yes. We sign your NDA. Writers are given only materials that you send and work from those only. We reuse nothing. The copyright transfers to you upon delivery. We will not put any client work in our sample library without written permission.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees