Mission and vision statements differ in timeline. A mission explains the present, and a vision explains the future, describing a goal that ought to be so clear that after ten years someone can easily explain whether or not you have reached that goal.
Most failures occur because of the lack of naming a year and a change. The first question is what the world would look like when the vision has been accomplished. The second question is who from outside the organization would observe it.
A worthwhile vision can get people to act differently on a Tuesday. It can also help a product team deny a feature request and a recruiter say something real. An articulated destination is required, the mood is not enough. It also requires leadership to settle on a defined target, which is the thing they usually rebel against the most.
No year is specified in a generated vision--neither are any changes. There is a vision of a world where technology enables people to live in a better version of the world. Because of that, without a year or change, it will never be possible to say if this vision was achieved. Therefore, nobody can feel embarrassed for failing to achieve it, nor is it possible to utilize it to justify a specific course of action.
The writer prompts you to imagine what changes for your customers if this works. The questions continue until you stop giving abstract answers. Options are written at various levels of motivation and each is paired with a brief account of what would have to be true in order for that option to become a reality.
This one will likely come back marked up. Vision wording tends to illicit opinions from all sorts of business stakeholders and, generally, the two rounds dedicated to this task tend to help narrow a point, rather than rewrite. The writer will log the versions you reject and provide a rationale, which prevents the same discussion from happening in November.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical vision statement | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brief | 250 | $25 | $0.25 | $25.25 |
| Standard | 600 | $60 | $0.60 | $60.60 |
| Detailed | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Every draft goes through an editor, then through several AI detectors and a plagiarism check. Anything that does not come back clean is revised or reassigned. You get the reports with the delivery email.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
Aims to be far enough much as to not be an imminent target, yet close enough for current employees to still be with the company. Generally, five to ten years works for most companies. The author will push back against a horizon you name if it makes the statement irreproachable.
Not always. Small teams tend to operate well with just a single, clear sentence. You’d best try them both and see if they can work together to get different tasks done. And a writer is the sort to tell you when the second is actually the first and assembles it with some long adjectives.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees