A shareholder letter carries a signature. That changes everything, including how it has to be written. As readers review shareholder letters, they are evaluating whether the person who signed it also spoke on the results call. They also see whether they mentioned the mistake that was made.
The most frequently quoted letters often tell the writer something he/she has not acknowledged or gotten right. Such style of writing is more of an editorial opinion and cannot be polished. A writer can only make a decision and help the reader understand that.
Will require multiple talks with whomever signs the letter, since the tone has to be genuinely theirs and cannot be faked. Expect the writer to ask you what you would rather not disclose, and expect them to try to defend stating it. Expect the use of legal terms and phrasing to be reviewed, as the drafters are unwilling/unable to assist.
A generated shareholder letter mimics all ever published letters resulting in a competent voice belonging to no one. The form functions because an actual person has assigned their name to a certain text. Vacationing, or averaging, removes the exact accountability that shareholders look for when they open a letter.
The writer reviews your last three letters, the results announcements, and analyst questionnaires, then interviews the signer for an hour. The first draft usually includes the awkward paragraph with a note explaining the reasoning. It is your choice if you would like the awkward paragraph to stay, however, you will do so consciously.
You receive the letter in an editable format with a marked copy showing each section the counsel should read before they publish it. Within three days you receive the email with attached detector reports. The two revision rounds are proposed to be done based on the signer’s suggested edits. This is the actual purpose of the revision rounds.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical shareholder letter | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| In-depth | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
We match the brief to a writer who has already worked in that subject area. If you have worked with an Articled writer before and want them again, name them and we will check their availability first.
Up to 3 days. The writer has to read around the subject before writing it, so we quote honestly rather than promising an hour. If your deadline is tighter, say so in the brief and we will tell you before you pay whether we can meet it.
Yes, at least once and preferably twice. There is no way to write in somebody’s voice from a brief prepared by their assistant. An hour of recorded conversation is worth more than any quantity of background documents.
We draft it and flag it. As for statements that are future looking, results references, and items touching guidance, we recommend you consult with your legal counsel or company secretary. We write, and do not advise. So we will never tell you anything is compliant.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees