A mission statement should be able to settle a dispute. If two managers can each say it supports their decision, considered in opposition, when supporting each, the mission statement is decoration. It is this harder standard that we aim for when crafting mission statements.
The output almost always has multiple components to each selection and their respective rationales. The selection of the components is yours to determine, and you must have something to defend in order to argue something substantively.
A useful test is if a competitor was able to sign your mission without changing a word. Most people ignore missions that fail that test. If you can name who you serve and what you won’t do, writing a mission usually takes a writer asking the leadership team questions that they have refused to answer for at least a year.
An inventive model returns the grammatical average of each mission written. It empowers people to deliver sustained impact with cutting-edge offerings. It is fluent, unobjectionable, and completely worthless for saying no to anything, which is the main reason the phrase exists.
The writer listens to a founder for the sentence they are likely to use informally, interviews them, and draws up a range of different possible responses, from the most restrictive to the most expansive. Each of these comes with a note on the commitment that this statement entails, because the most common case is to develop a statement that satisfies and yet causes no commitment at all.
Things you write are likely to elicit more internal opinion than anything else we write, which is why we have proposed two rounds of feedback for this section. Provide consolidated feedback once rather than in fragments. This helps the writer refine the language more effectively without losing the point being addressed. The 14-day time frame allows you enough time to get your peers to review your shortlist.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical mission statement | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brief | 250 | $25 | $0.25 | $25.25 |
| Standard | 600 | $60 | $0.60 | $60.60 |
| Detailed | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Every draft goes through an editor, then through several AI detectors and a plagiarism check. Anything that does not come back clean is revised or reassigned. You get the reports with the delivery email.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
Five written at the standard length, with a range to give the impression of a choice. If they all start sounding the same, the brief was not wide enough, and the writer comes back to you instead of padding the list with near-duplicates.
We write, you consult. Getting feedback condensed into sentences with explanations, instead of general preferences, helps most. A writer can work to remove a phrase that turns away the largest potential customer, but can do very little with the statement that someone is not particular.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees