Statistics pages are some of the quickest to attract links, so these pages deserve the extra attention. Once you put a number out there, it’s taken by someone else with your name attached to it.
Most of what you are doing is verifying. Locate the figure, locate the original study, confirm the study still says what the roundup does, and record the date.
Why No-AI Statistics Pages Should Be Written for People First
A typical reader of a statistics page is planning to use your numbers in their deck, pitch or article. In either case, they need a source. A page listing a lot of big numbers without any sources is a waste to them. It is also wasteful to list a number that you found in a roundup elsewhere.
Where AI falls down on statistics pages
Models give fake statistics that sound legitimate. A statistic published under your name will quickly spread in the digital age. Easy to check citations are a publication’s last line of defense against the spread of bad information, and models remove this defense.
How We Optimize No-AI Statistics Pages Without AI
Researchers call candidate figures those that fit the requirements of a study in which the researchers plan to use them. During the scoping process, most figures will be discarded as unable to be traced. This pruning step eliminates a third of the figures in a given industry. Surprisingly, a high number of widely quoted statistics can be traced back to a blog post that cites another blog post. Researchers publish the origin of figures in the documents for which they use the figures.
Search Intent and Structure for No-AI Statistics Pages
Those who visit these pages have simply one number in mind, therefore, writing has to prioritize scanning. Therefore, writing should incorporate sections with headings, independent figures, and quick one-paragraph descriptions that simply give the overview of the collection and what the author has deliberately left out.
What statistics pages cost
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
Typical statistics page
Words
Writing
Fee (1%)
You pay
Short
500
$50
$0.50
$50.50
Standard
1,000
$100
$1
$101
In-depth
2,000
$200
$2
$202
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting.
Full pricing breakdown.
No-AI Statistics Pages SEO FAQs
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Each year, for most subjects, or as frequently as your industry issues benchmark reports. We publish a short list of the figures and sections with the least life expectancy. Check this list first rather than reading the entire page repeatedly.
We leave this out. Repeated numbers most likely trace back to nothing. Inheriting unverifiable numbers builds your credibility behind those numbers. If the number is important, we will look for verified sources to support our claim.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews
What clients say about our statistics pages
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
AQAndrés QHead of Growth, Tinbridge
Fair to the competitor, which sold it
I expected a hatchet job. Instead, the page says where the tool is not as good, and recommends who we are best suited for. Lately, sales has been sending this to prospects. This only works because people think it’s a handy document, not marketing.
Verified orderComparison pagesNovember 2025
ANAiko NContent Strategist, Larkspur Collective
Planning was strong, one article thin
The cluster map was very helpful and helped us rethink that section of the site. Of the six supporting articles, we would rate five of them as strong articles, and the one article seems to have run out of research. That one has been resent, and we noticed an improvement the second time that article was submitted.
Verified orderTopic clustersJanuary 2026
FMFiona McLHead of Digital, Trelawn Retail Group
Twelve town pages, three felt repetitive
Nine of the twelve pages felt like they were town specific. Three were repetitive due to the same town name swapping, which is what I was trying to pay to avoid with this. They rewrote two of the three town pages with zero argument. The last one I rewrote myself.