Referencing may seem easy, but that’s only because it is not always obvious where the difficulties actually lie. A journal article takes ten seconds. A government dataset, a podcast episode, a preprint later published under a different title, an archived web page with no author: these are the ones that will take up an entire evening.
This service is for the tough cases and for the reconciliation. Every in-text citation matched to a list entry, every entry matched back, and documented decisions for each source, even the style guide never dreamed to mention.
Designs of style guides leave room for interpretation. As a result, departments end up doing their own thing which leads to variations. For example, your friend’s reference list is probably never going to look like what your marker is looking for. And that’s okay! You just need to choose one interpretation of the rule and run with it as long as you provide a justification in the end for the more exotic examples.
Citation models and generators reproduce all the metadata they’ve been given. If one erroneous publication year enters the record from a poor database, that error spreads to your list, to your text, and to a marker searching for a paper that in that year was published.
Incorrect references are usually the result of improperly formatted copied lists. Real records are checked against each source for accuracy. All of the sources, including wild-cards, are formatted and resolved. Any discrepancies in the list are resolved and the document is reconciled against the citations in your paper.
We allow students to format references as it is straightforward work that assesses no skills. What we will not do is add citations to statements that do not have any as this means finding sources for points that you have not cited. This is another activity that is required of you.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical referencing assistance | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short list | 250 | $25 | $0.25 | $25.25 |
| Standard | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Extensive | 1,500 | $150 | $1.50 | $151.50 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
APA, MLA, both Chicago, Vancouver, IEEE and OSCOLA, and most departmental house styles guide all are available. Send the style guide your department publishes if it has one, especially for Harvard and Chicago house styles. In general, institutions vary more in Harvard and Chicago systems than students perceive.
Yes, often. Even if you send only a fragment of a title or incorrectly remember a name of an author, most researchers try to identify your source. If not, we tell you there is no way to find the source rather than implanting a false source in the catalog.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
I’ve been reading in this area for a year and a half. This review found three new papers for me, including one from 2019 that completely contradicts what I’ve been saying. Annoying, but useful, and it’s what I paid for.
Corrections are often accompanied by notes, and about a third of the notes are short explanations. I’ve learned more about comma splices from this one document than from three years of tutoring and feedback.
The learning goals align with the scheme of work, and the differentiation notes are useful. It looks like you’re anticipating a classroom that settles in about two minutes, and two minutes is a dream. Most likely an easy fix for our teachers, but it shows a lack of recent teaching experience.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees