Staff members have a certain frame of mind when they read internal announcements. They skim for the sentence(s) that concern them, and then, if such sentences aren’t included in the first hundred words, they assume the sentence(s) are being deliberately omitted. Everything else in the message comes second (or even third, fourth, etc).
Good internal writing means mostly saying what is happening in an ordered fashion and in a precise manner. So, give a brief description of the change, the affected constituents, the date, and the justification for those who want to know why it is happening.
A reader should be able to answer three questions after a single reading: what is happening, how does this affect me, and what are the next steps. Warmth without these details is evasive. There is a process to writing, and details should always go first. Tone should always be added after the details, never the other way around.
Internal messages are often about balancing reassurances with specific details. Thousands of words are written to describe the exhilarating journey staff will embark on, but none are used to indicate which positions will be affected. The gap is filled by a group chat nobody in HR is able to monitor.
Every writer in this group has signed an agreement on drafting, editing and research. No humanizers will be permitted under any circumstances. In actuality, the content is the best protection. These compositions are built from your choices, your dates and the people you have named. None of that has been shown to any model.
Internal messages make more of an impact on staff because they compare them to what they can see. We see screenshots of a restructure post that goes against your careers page. We like to write announcements to go next to your messages to help fill in any gaps where internal and external messaging has gotten out of sync.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical employee communication | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| In-depth | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Anything from 100 words up. Because you pay by the word you are never buying padding to fill a package tier.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
Yes, and it is worth starting early. The writer distinguishes what has been decided from what is still to-be-determined and conveys this in the message. Staff appreciate and process honest uncertainty far better than a confident statement that changes the following week.
Someone will have to account for this later. A signed note from a remote executive leaves one wondering where their own manager stands. The writer matches the voice to the named sender which usually results in fewer polished sentences.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our old procedures were written by people who understood the process. These are not. They name each button on each step. Two of our newer drivers used them without even asking me questions, which has never happened before.
Rewritten policy that is ninety pages long and uses plain English. Nothing important was lost in the process of softening legal language. Our employment solicitor changed only four words. This brings me satisfaction because it seems that the staff actually read the policy unlike before. I had lost hope on that.
The first brief we received was too general. The writer noted this rather than trying to understand it himself. We did a twenty-minute call. Obviously frustrating that it was needed, still useful that this happened, as the finalized procedures reflect the way the warehouse operates. This includes the different procedures the night shift performs.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees