Course design Fails at the joins. The outcomes state that students will critically evaluate, the assessment asks them to describe, and the sessions never practice either evaluation or description. Each segment is justified and the course does not function, and this is apparent in the marks.
Each goal is accomplished by all sessions. Outcomes have teaching sessions and assessments. Anything without an assessment either gets an assessment added or gets removed from the outcomes.
Constructive alignment is mere jargon for audit. It takes about ten minutes to write down outcomes on the left side and sessions/assessments across the top to find the gaps. Most courses tend to have two outcomes that go unassessed and one assessment that tests something that was never taught and goes unnoticed until a validation panel does.
Course outlines which are produced automatically have neatly defined twelve weeks with a topic for each week, and no relationship exists between the topics and the assessment. In week nine, a subject is covered that the exam never asks about, and the assessment is for a skill that is present in no week of the sessions.
The writer creates the alignment matrix before the drafting of any content in order to locate gaps while they are still cost effective. Sessions are written against this matrix and are sized to the credit hours allocated; the writing of the drafts is not sized according to the writer’s enthusiasm, and assessment briefs reuse command verbs from the outcomes being assessed.
Courses get validated and panels ask who wrote what. Commissioned course development is commonplace, and should be noted in the documentation. Documentation records the transfer of copyright to your institution upon delivery. Revising the material each year will not require a copyright trip back to us.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical course material | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short guide | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Standard guide | 2,500 | $250 | $2.50 | $252.50 |
| Comprehensive guide | 5,000 | $500 | $5 | $505 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Yes. Send the template and any panel feedback from previous submissions, because panels tend to be consistent about what they push back on. Writing to their headings from the start saves a whole round of revisions later.
Yes, items are sized to credit hours rather than what specialists may like to assign. Each item includes a brief rationale as to the reason for the inclusion and an approximate time to complete. This helps students with planning, and it allows you to justify the load to the students.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Module text that thinks the reader is both intelligent and new, which is a harder combo than you would think. The exercises build up appropriately. Our tutors have quit writing extra handouts, and that is the only feedback I trust.
I had hit a wall on two papers behind paywalls. Rather than skipping them or paraphrasing the abstracts, the writer found the accessible preprints, used those, and said so in a note. Small thing. It is the thing that told me a person did this.
I had tried for two weeks to justify to myself having a “gap year” out of studies, and to explain it in a way that doesn’t sound like I simply wasted my year. I got a revision of my explanation that made my “gap year” the most affirmative selling point of my whole explanation, and my facts did not even change.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees