With documentation, developers tend to skip everything and just run the first code snippet to determine if they should continue. This mindset leads to skipping the documentation altogether because developers want instant answers. Documentation evaluators should first provide a way to run the code snippets so developers can make an evaluation faster rather than developers taking a punt and running the code to evaluate the documentation.
Which is why the quickstart is the most important page you own, and why it should end in something visibly working rather than something correctly configured.
Code examples that function and the reader’s selected value substitutions included. Prose is there to assist the code and does not attempt to compete with it. The assessment is straightforward: if a person other than the author is able to obtain a result in ten minutes without having to open a second tab to find out what a placeholder means, then the author has successfully implemented their design.
A model writing SDK combines elements from multiple versions. It can combine a method from your latest release with a two-version-old initialization pattern since both occurred in its training data. The sample code compile in a reader’s head but fails to compile on their machine. They blame the SDK instead of the documentation.
To understand your SDK, the writer develops a small example that demonstrates your SDK in action. By doing this, the writer identifies broken or poorly documented aspects of your SDK. When developers document their software, they typically explain how they envision a user interacting with the software. In reality, the documentation may not actually align with how the software will be used.
Developer content is partitioned across the docs site, the README file, sample repositories, and the dashboard. Over the course of two releases, content from these four areas becomes less related. We ensure consistency of terminology and sample style throughout all the areas of interest. We also identify those areas outside of interest which now contradict the new set.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical developer documentation | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | 500 | $50 | $0.50 | $50.50 |
| Standard | 1,000 | $100 | $1 | $101 |
| In-depth | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
Ask on the contact page and a person will answer, usually the same working day. For a live order, reply to your confirmation email and it reaches whoever is handling it.
We can tell that you try your best to execute these briefs by constructing a small integration and reading the source code. We go by stack, and we will decline briefs in a language that no one in the group can work on rather than give you samples that were never done.
Separate work, yes. Each will not be the same, with one being a translation of the other. Idiomatic Python cannot be translated to idiomatic Go. If you could just choose the languages that interest you most, we would be able to put in the proper amount of work and not six languages poorly.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
Our release notes went unread, but they serve the purpose of listing what breaks and what doesn’t when considering whether to upgrade. Two customers actually took the time to send thank yous in the same week, something that had never happened before.
Our releases happen every fortnight, and our notes have evolved into change logs. To keep things organized, the writer has noted what changed within a card or view and what changed underneath. Each note is a brief summary of the change. The biggest metric I’m interested in post release is the volume of support tickets. It always dips.
Ordering is clearly very good, and the screenshots are clearly explained. The guide assumes the customer has admin access, which a good number of them do not. We wrote a pre-req box ourselves in ten minutes. Everything else was complete.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees