A profile is going to fail in one of two ways, each yielding equally poor results. It will either take the form of a resume with adjectives or it will be a load of insincere flattery that results in the reader losing faith in everything that is said. Writing these types is much easier than the few paragraphs that actually yield the desired effect.
This version includes a unique case study: how a person avoids answering a question they do not like, the defense they still show for a decision made, how their voice changes with the topic.
Profiles are about people that are still alive and everything in them can be corroborated by the person who knows them the best. Getting the date, job title, or company name wrong means the piece gets rejected by the person it is trying to honor. Man-made text about individuals creates confident biography that belongs to someone else.
When prompted with a named individual, a model often fills in the gaps. It merges two individuals with the same name, promotes someone a level early, and even creates an award. Each one of these errors is about a real person, and will be read by that person. Therefore, the correction has to be made known to the public.
The writer interviews the subject and, where the brief allows it, two colleagues of the subject. Including people from outside the subject’s circle is what stops a profile becoming an autobiography. Facts must be checked separately because people tend to misremember the order of events much more frequently than expected.
Who is the profile for? Who will read it? Investors and recruiters have different interests about the same person, so please tell us. We can contact the subject ourselves and use our best effort to reach two of their colleagues as well. Interviews take about one week to set up, and we give you the interview date during payment.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical profile | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short profile | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Standard profile | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| Long-form profile | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
Yes. Send two or three pieces you like the sound of, or your style guide. Matching an established voice is ordinary work for a writer and close to impossible for a model that has never read your back catalogue.
Yes. Tell us the volume and cadence and we keep the same writer on the account so the voice stays consistent. The rate does not change with volume.
They check facts by default. We will copy approve everything for you if you want, but we can tell you what the tradeoff is. Profiles that the subject edits tend to be read more carefully, and readers can typically spot which type of article they are reading.
Yes, but it will still work better with people. A company profile built using three interviews and one real-life choice will read better than one that was built from the history section of a website.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
The reported elements and the interviewed elements were both well communicated. The middle third went a bit offtop, so I reorganized it instead of waiting for a revision. We were on a deadline tonight to close the issue. With another day I would have sent it back to you. Great writer, short deadline, my choice.
Thought leadership is typically an overview of what is already commonplace. This essay takes a stance in favor of warehouse automation, and even has a paragraph in addressing the automation argument. Given this pushback in the comments, that is actually the goal.
The writer emailed before beginning the draft to ask about the churn data we presented to the board. In our slide deck, there were two data points, and they had a discrepancy which no one has pointed out to me before. The draft used the correct number and flagged the discrepancy in a footnote.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees