A good review should clear why the reviewer liked/disliked the thing they reviewed. The best of those reviews will name the thing they disliked and indicate why that didn’t impact their review.
We write from use. This includes what was tested, how long the tests were conducted for, how the tests were conducted, and where reasonable people’s judgments may vary from the reviewer’s.
Reviews have become defensive. Readers arrive containing suspicions that the review may be a paid posting. They typically expect no genuine opinions, no insight, just poor attempts to paint a general overview. An AI-generated review checks all the boxes for a bad review. Therefore, the reviews generated by AI fail the same tests that the reviewed formats have to face.
Without access to the product, a model examines the marketing copy. This is where they are always doomed to fail. Readers immediately recognize the issue caused by this approach; a list of benefits is identical to a list of features that the manufacturer described in the same order, with nothing in the marketing copy that only the user of the product would discover.
You indicate whether the subject is a commissioned piece or something you chose. That defines the disclosure and the tone, but not the honesty. The reviewer goes to a lot of trouble to keep notes when they go, and develops their conclusion before crafting their introduction. Experiment Results Conclusion Introduction Notes Verdict
Three things hold true for every review we file. We don’t praise what we didn’t experience. Anything that appears to be a conflict is explained in the review instead of in a footnote. And the verdict holds up if the writer is asked to justify it after the review.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical review | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short review | 700 | $70 | $0.70 | $70.70 |
| Standard review | 1,200 | $120 | $1.20 | $121.20 |
| In-depth review | 2,000 | $200 | $2 | $202 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
What the piece is for, who reads it, roughly how long it should be, and anything it must include or avoid. Links to your existing material help. If you are unsure, send what you have and the writer will come back with questions.
Up to 3 days. The writer has to read around the subject before writing it, so we quote honestly rather than promising an hour. If your deadline is tighter, say so in the brief and we will tell you before you pay whether we can meet it.
We promise a genuine review of one star if you give one. If the reviewer’s honest sense is genuine praise, then you will get praise. What we won’t do is praise something which is not worthy or hide issues. A review which is perceived to be bought is of no value.
Yes to whatever the reviewer cannot otherwise access. A free trial, a loaner review unit/sample, a loan with a fixed borrowing period — all of those work. Without access to the piece, all we have is a preview based on other published works, which we clearly state.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
We received delivery around the end of day three. I based my weekly schedule around my day two expectations, which was an assumption, not their guarantee. The instructions are thorough, and they are right to be careful considering the different aspects of our process that might change from one area to the other.
We provided a recording and a rough transcript. What came back left the subject’s hesitations in the most important places, and removed them otherwise. They wrote to say that it was the first time they had read an interview of themselves that sounded accurate.
The quality I had no problems with. The timing was way off. I thought a 900 word how-to would show up in a day, and I had to use up the whole three days. My bad for not checking the delivery terms. There was one measurement that had to be fixed, and that one came back in a couple of hours.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees