Promising that at the end of this tutorial, the reader ends up with a working program is a great way to capture and keep people’s interest, however, breaking that promise will make people not stop with the tutorial and will stop them from coming back to a site that broke a promise.
Each tutorial is built first, then written. So the writer does this in a clean environment, versions everything, and saves the project files so it can be run again if anything upstream changes.
All other formats will let readers come to their own conclusions. With tutorials, however, readers can immediately decide if you are correct. No dependency version will exist. A flag that was removed in the last two releases. An example that relies on a file that you did not suggest they make. All these things read the tutorials and stick in their minds, but all these things are invisible in prose that was never executed.
Coding solutions in your mind succeed, while coding them on the computer fails. Names of functions and order of arguments get swapped, and an example imports a package that doesn’t even exist. The writing style remains confident, which is how the reader spends an hour being certain the problem is in their code.
Most tutorial writers build and explain second, but for this project, the writer does it the other way around. They explain what they built, keep a copy of the terminal commands, and show failures they believe are important. Another individual takes this draft and builds the project entirely on their own before reporting what failed.
The written tutorial, code blocks, stated environment with pinned versions, and expected output at each checkpoint so readers know they have not strayed from the correct path. If the project generated files, you will receive the repository layout description and the source deposited along with it.
One rate, whatever the format: $10 per 100 words. You are paying for the writer’s time and judgement, so the price scales with the words rather than with a package tier.
| Typical tutorial | Words | Writing | Fee (1%) | You pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short tutorial | 800 | $80 | $0.80 | $80.80 |
| Standard tutorial | 1,500 | $150 | $1.50 | $151.50 |
| Multi-part tutorial | 2,800 | $280 | $2.80 | $282.80 |
The writer receives 100% of the writing price. Our 1% fee is added on top of it, and 0.5% is donated to tree planting. Full pricing breakdown.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
A named human writer with a background in this kind of work. No model drafts, outlines, edits or researches any part of it, and nothing is run through an AI humanizer. Every draft is checked against multiple detectors before it reaches you.
Yes we use the examples from the tutorials and we test them. We are not a development service, so we won’t build your production feature, but the sample project a reader follows along with is part of the job.
Tell us the stack and we confirm whether a writer who has shipped in it is free before you order. If nobody suitable is available we say no, rather than assigning someone who will learn it on your budget and your deadline.
Completely. Copyright transfers to you on delivery, with no attribution requirement and no licence back to us. Nothing written for you is resold, repurposed or republished.
Reviews from completed, paid orders in this category.
A lot of thought leadership articles outline a few positions and remain neutral. This piece takes a stand on procurement in the second paragraph and supports it for 1100 words. Two rivals have written answers. That was the goal.
I needed a write-up and got a list of questions, which I ended up copying completely. Question 9 opened a topic that the person had never publicly discussed. The edits of the transcript kept her cadence.
Our interviewed subject speaks with a style that is easy to modify into uninspired corporate-speak. The transcriber has authentic cadence, and does not rely on filler. The natural speech of a person is easier to understand. We have filled three more bookings.
We do not ask you to take the no-AI promise on trust. Each draft is run through these platforms and the reports are attached to your delivery email.
Originality.aiAI detection + plagiarism
GPTZeroAI detection
TurnitinAI detection + similarity
CopyleaksAI detection + plagiarism
Winston AIAI detection
ZeroGPTAI detection
SaplingAI detection
Content at ScaleAI detection
Send the brief, get a human draft back within 3 days. No account, no subscription, no AI.
$10 per 100 words · all of it to the writer · 0.5% to trees